Bombay High Court Dismisses Larsen & Toubro’s Challenge to ₹8,000 Crore Tunnel Tender: “Suppression of Relevant Facts Disqualifies Party from Equitable Relief” — Accepted Confidentiality Clauses Bar Midway Interference, No Violation of Natural Justice

Bombay High Court Dismisses Larsen & Toubro’s Challenge to ₹8,000 Crore Tunnel Tender: “Suppression of Relevant Facts Disqualifies Party from Equitable Relief” — Accepted Confidentiality Clauses Bar Midway Interference, No Violation of Natural Justice

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking to restrain the Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) from opening financial bids in the ₹8,000 crore Gaimukh–Fountain underground…
Delhi HC Sets Aside NCDRC’s Unilateral Order Enhancing Interest — Holds That While Appeals Can Be Dismissed at Threshold Without Notice, Adverse Orders Cannot Be Passed Without Hearing the Affected Party: “If the Appeal is to Be Disposed of to the Detriment of the Opposite Side, Notice Must Be Issued”

Delhi High Court Sets Aside NCDRC’s Unilateral Order Enhancing Interest — Holds That While Appeals Can Be Dismissed at Threshold Without Notice, Adverse Orders Cannot Be Passed Without Hearing the Affected Party: “If the Appeal is to Be Disposed of to the Detriment of the Opposite Side, Notice Must Be Issued”

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court allowed the civil miscellaneous petition challenging the order dated 27.12.2024 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC). The NCDRC’s order, which modified…
Supreme Court Holds Probation of Offenders Act and Sentence Reduction Under Food Safety and Standards Act Not Applicable to Convictions Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act Between 1976–2006 — Converts Jail Term to Fine on Grounds of Judicial Comity Despite Legislative Bar

Supreme Court Holds Probation of Offenders Act and Sentence Reduction Under Food Safety and Standards Act Not Applicable to Convictions Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act Between 1976–2006 — Converts Jail Term to Fine on Grounds of Judicial Comity Despite Legislative Bar

Court’s Decision The Supreme Court dismissed the legal challenges raised by two sets of appellants seeking the benefit of probation and reduced sentencing under the Food Safety and Standards Act,…
Delhi High Court Holds Delay in Filing Amended Written Statement in Commercial Suit Can Be Condoned if Prejudice Would Otherwise Be Caused: “If Amended Written Statementis Taken Off the Record, It Would Cause Serious Prejudice to the Defendant” — Allows Amended Pleading Filed 89 Days After Amended Plaint

Delhi High Court Holds Delay in Filing Amended Written Statement in Commercial Suit Can Be Condoned if Prejudice Would Otherwise Be Caused: “If Amended Written Statementis Taken Off the Record, It Would Cause Serious Prejudice to the Defendant” — Allows Amended Pleading Filed 89 Days After Amended Plaint

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner's plea to take the amended written statement on record despite a delay in filing. The Court held that although timeframes for…
Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court’s Direction Requiring Insurer to Provide Prosthetic Limbs, Wheelchair, Travel Costs and Ongoing Assistance to Accident Victim: “Future Wellbeing Can Only Be Compensated in Monetary Terms” — Enhances Award by ₹12 Lakhs

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court’s Direction Requiring Insurer to Provide Prosthetic Limbs, Wheelchair, Travel Costs and Ongoing Assistance to Accident Victim: “Future Wellbeing Can Only Be Compensated in Monetary Terms” — Enhances Award by ₹12 Lakhs

Court’s Decision The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the insurance company, setting aside the High Court’s direction requiring it to provide prosthetic limbs, a motorized wheelchair, travel costs,…
Bombay High Court Sets Aside Insurance Ombudsman’s Award Upholding Rejection of Cancer Claim: “Occasional Alcohol Consumption Not Ground for Repudiation, No Nexus with Ailment Proven — Insurer’s Conduct Demonstrates Non-Disclosure Did Not Affect the Contract” — Directs Insurer to Honour ₹17.77 Lakh Claim

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Insurance Ombudsman’s Award Upholding Rejection of Cancer Claim: “Occasional Alcohol Consumption Not Ground for Repudiation, No Nexus with Ailment Proven — Insurer’s Conduct Demonstrates Non-Disclosure Did Not Affect the Contract” — Directs Insurer to Honour ₹17.77 Lakh Claim

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court quashed the Award dated 10 June 2024 passed by the Insurance Ombudsman that had upheld the rejection of the petitioner’s health insurance claim amounting…