Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news Raw Law

Unfiltered Legal Insights

  • News
  • Services for Advocates
  • Bookmarks
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

and Retaliatory Allegations Insufficient to Constitute an Offence Under Sections 354-A and 354-D IPC

Home - and Retaliatory Allegations Insufficient to Constitute an Offence Under Sections 354-A and 354-D IPC

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Joint Manager Alleging Workplace Harassment, Holds General, Vague, and Retaliatory Allegations Insufficient to Constitute an Offence Under Sections 354-A and 354-D IPC
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Joint Manager Alleging Workplace Harassment, Holds General, Vague, and Retaliatory Allegations Insufficient to Constitute an Offence Under Sections 354-A and 354-D IPC

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court quashed the First Information Report (FIR) registered under Sections 354-A (sexual harassment) and 354-D (stalking) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) against the applicant.…
Posted by Rawlaw January 21, 2025

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court: “Unsuccessful Party Can Also Seek Section 9 Protection”; L&T Directed To Keep ₹150 Crore Bank Guarantee Alive In ONGC Arbitration
  • “He Who Seeks Equity Must Do Equity”: Supreme Court Holds Specific Performance Decree Becomes Inexecutable If Balance Sale Consideration Is Not Deposited Within Time
  • Bombay High Court Rejects Tenants’ Plea To Add New Developer; Says Application Prima Facie Appears “Moved And Financed” By Proposed Developer, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs
  • Bombay High Court Refuses To Cancel Bail In Pending Murder Appeal; Says “Bail Once Granted Ought Not To Be Cancelled” Without Strong Grounds
  • Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against HDFC Bank And Phoenix ARC Officials Filed After Recovery Proceedings; Says “Personal Vendetta Writ Large”, Investigation Would Be Abuse Of Process
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top