“Criticism of Reservation System Does Not Constitute Promotion of Hatred Without Clear Evidence”

Home - "Criticism of Reservation System Does Not Constitute Promotion of Hatred Without Clear Evidence"

Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Affirms Discharge of Accused in Atrocities Act Case: “Criticism of Reservation System Does Not Constitute Promotion of Hatred Without Clear Evidence”

Court’s Decision:The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench dismissed the appeal filed under Section 14A of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989,…

Posted by

Rawlaw December 22, 2024

Recent News

Bombay High Court: “Unilateral Change in Date of Birth at Fag End of Service Violates Natural Justice” — Pension Rights Cannot Be Denied Without Due Process
Bombay High Court: “Allegations of Harassment Do Not Automatically Constitute Abetment to Suicide” — Conviction Set Aside for Lack of Mens Rea, “Mere harassment, absent any clear intention to drive the victim to suicide, cannot amount to abetment under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code.”
Bombay High Court: “Person Having Interest Must Be a Trustee or Beneficiary” Upholds Rejection of Impleadment Under Trust Act, reinforces the limited scope of Section 73A — only trustees, beneficiaries, or active members can intervene in trust proceedings.
Bombay High Court: “Suppression or concealment of material facts is not advocacy — it is jugglery, manipulation, and misrepresentation, which has no place in equitable jurisdiction.” Imposes ₹5 Lakh Cost for Suppression of Facts in Slum Rehab Case — “Litigants Cannot Play Hide and Seek with the Court”
Bombay High Court: “Conviction Cannot Rest on Unreliable Eyewitness Testimony — Every Discrepancy Strikes at the Root of the Prosecution Case”

Scroll to Top