Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Delhi High Court Validates ₹247 Crore Long-Term Capital Gains Exemption: Clarifies Interplay Between Section 10(38) and Section 115JB

Home » Delhi High Court Validates ₹247 Crore Long-Term Capital Gains Exemption: Clarifies Interplay Between Section 10(38) and Section 115JB
Delhi High Court Validates ₹247 Crore Long-Term Capital Gains Exemption: Clarifies Interplay Between Section 10(38) and Section 115JB, Rules LTCG Exemption Under Normal Provisions Unaffected by MAT Inclusion
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Validates ₹247 Crore Long-Term Capital Gains Exemption: Clarifies Interplay Between Section 10(38) and Section 115JB, Rules LTCG Exemption Under Normal Provisions Unaffected by MAT Inclusion

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court rejected the Revenue’s contention that the exemption under Section 10(38) of the Act was improperly allowed. It held that the Assessee was entitled to…
Posted by Rawlaw December 26, 2024

Recent News

  • Delhi High Court refuses to recall arbitrator appointment in Vedanta–GSPC gas dispute — foreign joint venture partner doesn’t convert case into international arbitration; jurisdictional objection premature, Section 16 remedy available
  • Supreme Court of India quashes minimum import price enforcement prior to Gazette publication — DGFT notification has no legal force until officially published; importers with prior letters of credit protected, appeals allowed
  • Delhi High Court orders perjury prosecution in arbitration fraud case — forged term sheet used to seek ₹490 crore interim relief; Section 340 invoked, Registrar directed to file complaint
  • Delhi High Court modifies MACT compensation in Oriental Insurance appeal — ITR-based income upheld, Pranay Sethi rationalisation applied; award reduced to ₹35.73 lakh
  • Delhi High Court partly sets aside arbitral award in brewery dispute — liquidated damages upheld as genuine pre-estimate; counterclaim for equipment rent revived due to ignored evidence
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top