Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news Raw Law

Unfiltered Legal Insights

  • News
  • Services for Advocates
  • Bookmarks
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Denies Trademark Registration for “ONE FOR ALL” Used for Educational Books — “No Secondary Meaning or Distinctiveness Established Under Section 9(1)(a) of the Trade Marks Act”

Home - Denies Trademark Registration for "ONE FOR ALL" Used for Educational Books — “No Secondary Meaning or Distinctiveness Established Under Section 9(1)(a) of the Trade Marks Act”

Delhi High Court Denies Trademark Registration for "ONE FOR ALL" Used for Educational Books — “No Secondary Meaning or Distinctiveness Established Under Section 9(1)(a) of the Trade Marks Act”
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Denies Trademark Registration for “ONE FOR ALL” Used for Educational Books — “No Secondary Meaning or Distinctiveness Established Under Section 9(1)(a) of the Trade Marks Act”

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal filed under Section 91 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, upholding the Registrar of Trade Marks’ refusal to register the mark…
Posted by Rawlaw May 31, 2025

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court At Goa Suspends 10-Year NDPS Sentence Of Nigerian National In Cocaine Case; Holds Appeal Unlikely To Be Heard Before Completion Of Sentence, “Prolonged Incarceration” Cannot Defeat Right Of Appeal
  • Bombay High Court Rejects Union’s Claim Over Mira-Bhayander Salt Pan Lands; Holds “The Plaintiff In A Suit For Declaration Of Title Must Succeed On The Strength Of Its Own Title”
  • Bombay High Court Dismisses Father’s Habeas Corpus Plea For Return Of Child To UK; Holds “Custody Of The Minor Child With The Mother Is Not Illegal”, Welfare Of Child Remains Paramount
  • Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Release Of Attached Property In NSEL-MPID Case; Holds “MPID Act Has No Provision Regarding Release Of Property In Favour Of The Owner, After An Order Is Passed Permitting Auction”
  • Bombay High Court Refuses Licence For Slot Machines In Five-Star Hotel, Holds “1992 Goa Amendment Act Was Never Brought Into Force” In Daman And Diu; Says “Use Of Electronic Amusement/Slot Machines Remained Prohibited”
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top