Disputed Facts

Home - Disputed Facts

Posted inNews

Chhattisgarh High Court Dismisses Contractor’s Writ for Compensation in Construction Dispute: “Disputed Questions of Fact Cannot Be Examined Under Article 226—Proper Remedy Lies Before Civil Court”

Court’s Decision The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking compensation for construction work allegedly executed and raw material lost due to…

Posted by

Rawlaw June 26, 2025

Posted inNews

Chhattisgarh High Court Refuses Payment Relief to Contractor for Pending Bills in Government Bridge Project: “Relief Cannot Be Granted Under Article 226 Where Factual Controversies Exist”

Court’s Decision In a judgment dated 9 June 2025, the Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking directions for payment of ₹76 lakhs in pending bills for a government…

Posted by

Rawlaw June 19, 2025

Recent News

“Comparable Sale Instances Must Prevail” – Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation After Finding Reference Court Erred in Ignoring Higher Valuation Evidence
“Arbitration Award Set Aside: Bombay High Court Slams ‘Denial of Natural Justice’ and Declares ‘An Arbitrator Must Give Reasons’ in a Powerful Ruling on Fundamental Policy Breach”
“Recovery Certificate Invalidated: Bombay High Court Issues a Powerful Warning That ‘Reasons Are the Soul of Justice’ While Reiterating That ‘A Registrar Must Apply His Mind Before Enforcing Recovery’”
Bombay High Court Declares That “A Clean Document Cannot Coexist With a Tainted Transaction,” Sets Aside Conviction After Finding Critical Contradictions in Evidence
Recovery Certificate under Section 101 Set Aside: Bombay High Court Holds That “Recording of Reasons Is a Fundamental Requirement” and Directs Denovo Inquiry for Non-Compliance with Rule 86A–86F

Scroll to Top