Disputed Facts

Home » Disputed Facts

Posted inNews

Chhattisgarh High Court Dismisses Contractor’s Writ for Compensation in Construction Dispute: “Disputed Questions of Fact Cannot Be Examined Under Article 226—Proper Remedy Lies Before Civil Court”

Court’s Decision The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking compensation for construction work allegedly executed and raw material lost due to…

Posted by

Rawlaw June 26, 2025

Posted inNews

Chhattisgarh High Court Refuses Payment Relief to Contractor for Pending Bills in Government Bridge Project: “Relief Cannot Be Granted Under Article 226 Where Factual Controversies Exist”

Court’s Decision In a judgment dated 9 June 2025, the Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking directions for payment of ₹76 lakhs in pending bills for a government…

Posted by

Rawlaw June 19, 2025

Recent News

Delhi High Court issues sweeping directions to curb trademark misuse through fraudulent domain names — “Registrars, banks, and government bodies bound to act, dynamic plus injunctions approved”
Delhi High Court issues landmark directions to dismantle fraudulent domain name ecosystem misusing well-known trademarks — “Online soul of businesses must be protected, systemic reforms mandated”
Delhi High Court holds London as the juridical seat and bars the Indian challenge to the foreign arbitral award — “Part I of the Arbitration Act excluded by necessary implication, Section 34 petition not maintainable”
Delhi High Court strikes down compulsory use of select bank EDC terminals at petrol pumps — “Exclusive payment routing held disproportionate, dealers’ business autonomy protected”
Delhi High Court orders rectification of trademark register by cancelling ‘BSM’ mark — “Prior user rights prevail over later registration, bad faith adoption inferred”

Scroll to Top