Does Not Bar Investigation into ₹409.26 Crore Bank Fraud Allegations

Home » Does Not Bar Investigation into ₹409.26 Crore Bank Fraud Allegations

Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Rules Section 32A IBC Grants Corporate Debtor Immunity from Prosecution Post-Resolution Plan but Does Not Bar Investigation into ₹409.26 Crore Bank Fraud Allegations

Court’s Decision: The Delhi High Court, while adjudicating the petition under Section 482 CrPC (now Section 528 BNSS), refused to quash the FIR against Gangakhed Sugar and Energy Ltd. The…

Posted by

Rawlaw December 31, 2024

Recent News

Delhi High Court enhances accident compensation to ₹76.40 lakh after recalculating disability and lifetime prosthetic needs — “Fair compensation must realistically restore dignity and mobility”
Delhi High Court enhances motor accident compensation to ₹76.4 lakh — “Prosthetic limb replacement for life must be factored; functional disability reassessed”
Delhi High Court refuses to interfere with arbitral tribunal’s procedural discretion — “Interlocutory orders allowing limited documents cannot be corrected under Article 227”
Delhi High Court upholds conviction for fatal road accident but reduces sentence after 20 years — “Sending accused to jail now would serve no purpose”
Delhi High Court declines Article 227 interference in civil suit procedure — “Trial court’s decision to hear legal issues first causes no prejudice”

Scroll to Top