Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news Raw Law

Unfiltered Legal Insights

  • News
  • Services for Advocates
  • Bookmarks
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Emphasizing the Absence of Express Statutory Provision and Restricting Respondents to Filing Separate Appeals

Home - Emphasizing the Absence of Express Statutory Provision and Restricting Respondents to Filing Separate Appeals

Delhi High Court Rules That Cross-Objections Are Not Maintainable in Income Tax Appeals Under Section 260A, Emphasizing the Absence of Express Statutory Provision and Restricting Respondents to Filing Separate Appeals
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Rules That Cross-Objections Are Not Maintainable in Income Tax Appeals Under Section 260A, Emphasizing the Absence of Express Statutory Provision and Restricting Respondents to Filing Separate Appeals

1. Court's Decision The court held that Section 260A does not confer a right on the respondent to file cross-objections. It emphasized that since the statute does not explicitly grant…
Posted by Rawlaw March 4, 2025

Recent News

  • Supreme Court Quashes CBI Case Filed Two Years After DRT Settlement, Says Bank Cannot Revive Criminal Prosecution After Accepting Full Settlement
  • “When Law Enforcers Turn Extortionists”: Supreme Court Cancels Anticipatory Bail Granted To Police Personnel Accused Of Extortion At Railway Station
  • Betting On Games Of Skill Is Not Immune”: Supreme Court Upholds Tamil Nadu And Karnataka Online Gaming Laws
  • Supreme Court Says False POCSO Allegations In Matrimonial Battles Can Ruin Reputations, Sets Aside Criminal Proceedings
  • Can Insolvency Stop A Cheque Bounce Case? Supreme Court Refers Section 138–IBC Moratorium Conflict To Larger Bench
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top