Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Enforces ₹39.75 Lakh Composition Charges on Petitioner for Delayed Construction; Criticizes Both DDA and Petitioner for Lapses

Home - Enforces ₹39.75 Lakh Composition Charges on Petitioner for Delayed Construction; Criticizes Both DDA and Petitioner for Lapses

Delhi High Court Enforces ₹39.75 Lakh Composition Charges on Petitioner for Delayed Construction; Criticizes Both DDA and Petitioner for Lapses, Holds Decades of Inaction Disentitle Relief Under Writ Jurisdiction
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Enforces ₹39.75 Lakh Composition Charges on Petitioner for Delayed Construction; Criticizes Both DDA and Petitioner for Lapses, Holds Decades of Inaction Disentitle Relief Under Writ Jurisdiction

Court’s Decision: The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner, holding them liable to pay composition charges amounting to ₹39,75,657 for the delay in construction on…
Posted by Rawlaw January 21, 2025

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court Holds That Land Reservation Under MRTP Act Lapses If No Acquisition Steps Are Taken: “Mere Payment for Measurement Charges Is Not a Step Towards Acquisition; Authorities Cannot Deprive Landowners of Their Rights Indefinitely”
  • Supreme Court Holds Termination of Daily-Wage Workmen Illegal: “Employer Cannot Use Recruitment Ban to Deny Regularization; Sections 6E & 6N of U.P. Industrial Disputes Act Violated”—Orders Reinstatement with Back Wages and Regularization Process
  • Delhi High Court Upholds Arbitral Award: Rejects Challenge Against Liquidated Damages, Unlawful Encashment of Performance Bank Guarantee, and Misinterpretation of Price Variation Clause in Metro Rail Supply Contract Dispute
  • Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award Rejecting Contractor’s Claims: Holds Clause 49.5 of GCC Validly Bars Damages for Employer-Caused Delays, Estoppel Prevents Appellant From Reneging on Written Undertakings, and Judicial Intervention Under Section 37 Arbitration Act is Limited
  • Bombay High Court Quashes IFS Officer’s Transfer Due to Procedural Irregularities: Holds Handwritten Alterations in Civil Services Board Minutes Render Decision Invalid, Leaves Open Question of State vs. Central Rules for Future Determination
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top