Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news Raw Law

Unfiltered Legal Insights

  • News
  • Services for Advocates
  • Bookmarks
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Held Liable – “Repetition of the Exact Words of the Section 141 Language in the Same Order

Home - Held Liable - “Repetition of the Exact Words of the Section 141 Language in the Same Order

Supreme Court Upholds Vicarious Liability in NI Act Proceedings - Respondent No. 2, Who Actively Negotiated the Facility, Executed the Loan and Security Documents, and Provided Personal Guarantees, Held Liable - “Repetition of the Exact Words of the Section 141 Language in the Same Order, Like a Mantra or a Magic Incantation is Not the Mandate of the Law”
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Upholds Vicarious Liability in NI Act Proceedings – Respondent No. 2, Who Actively Negotiated the Facility, Executed the Loan and Security Documents, and Provided Personal Guarantees, Held Liable – “Repetition of the Exact Words of the Section 141 Language in the Same Order, Like a Mantra or a Magic Incantation is Not the Mandate of the Law”

Court’s Decision The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by HDFC Bank Ltd. and set aside the judgment of the Bombay High Court dated 10.01.2024, which had quashed proceedings under…
Posted by Rawlaw May 28, 2025

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court Dismisses Father’s Habeas Corpus Plea For Return Of Child To UK; Holds “Custody Of The Minor Child With The Mother Is Not Illegal”, Welfare Of Child Remains Paramount
  • Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Release Of Attached Property In NSEL-MPID Case; Holds “MPID Act Has No Provision Regarding Release Of Property In Favour Of The Owner, After An Order Is Passed Permitting Auction”
  • Bombay High Court Refuses Licence For Slot Machines In Five-Star Hotel, Holds “1992 Goa Amendment Act Was Never Brought Into Force” In Daman And Diu; Says “Use Of Electronic Amusement/Slot Machines Remained Prohibited”
  • Bombay High Court Restores Written Statements In Commercial Suit Filed Within Statutory Outer Limit, Holds “Service Of Summons Without Copy Of Plaint And Accompaniments Would Not Constitute Valid Service In Law”
  • Bombay High Court Refuses To Decide ULC Possession Dispute In Writ Jurisdiction, Holds “Serious Disputed Questions Of Facts Arise”; Landowners Given Liberty To File Civil Suit
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top