Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Holding Execution Proceedings Are Not Governed by CPC or CCA

Home - Holding Execution Proceedings Are Not Governed by CPC or CCA

Bombay High Court Affirms Doctrine of Res Judicata; Dismisses Appeals Challenging Execution of Arbitral Awards Under Section 36 of the Arbitration Act, Holding Execution Proceedings Are Not Governed by CPC or CCA
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Affirms Doctrine of Res Judicata; Dismisses Appeals Challenging Execution of Arbitral Awards Under Section 36 of the Arbitration Act, Holding Execution Proceedings Are Not Governed by CPC or CCA

Court’s Decision: The Bombay High Court dismissed the appeals challenging orders in execution proceedings under Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (ACA). The court held that: Maintainability…
Posted by Rawlaw December 14, 2024

Recent News

  • “Comparable Sale Instances Must Prevail” – Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation After Finding Reference Court Erred in Ignoring Higher Valuation Evidence
  • “Arbitration Award Set Aside: Bombay High Court Slams ‘Denial of Natural Justice’ and Declares ‘An Arbitrator Must Give Reasons’ in a Powerful Ruling on Fundamental Policy Breach”
  • “Recovery Certificate Invalidated: Bombay High Court Issues a Powerful Warning That ‘Reasons Are the Soul of Justice’ While Reiterating That ‘A Registrar Must Apply His Mind Before Enforcing Recovery’”
  • Bombay High Court Declares That “A Clean Document Cannot Coexist With a Tainted Transaction,” Sets Aside Conviction After Finding Critical Contradictions in Evidence
  • Recovery Certificate under Section 101 Set Aside: Bombay High Court Holds That “Recording of Reasons Is a Fundamental Requirement” and Directs Denovo Inquiry for Non-Compliance with Rule 86A–86F
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top