“Inadequate Financial Disclosures and Discrepancies Justify Scrutiny Under Order XXI Rule 41 CPC”

Home - "Inadequate Financial Disclosures and Discrepancies Justify Scrutiny Under Order XXI Rule 41 CPC"

Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Orders Oral Examination of Director in Arbitral Award Enforcement: “Inadequate Financial Disclosures and Discrepancies Justify Scrutiny Under Order XXI Rule 41 CPC”

Court’s Decision:The High Court of Bombay, in its order dated November 27, 2024, directed Mr. Arun Chanda, one of the directors of the Judgment Debtor company, to appear for an…

Posted by

Rawlaw December 21, 2024

Recent News

Bombay High Court holds SVLDRS relief must be granted under ‘litigation’ category — ‘Duty not finally quantified; arrears classification unsustainable’
Bombay High Court refuses to interfere with arbitral award in TCS–Inspira IT dispute — ‘Plausible contractual interpretation cannot be reopened under Section 34’
Bombay High Court upholds arbitral award in BEST–advertising contract dispute — ‘Contractual formula for fleet-based display charges leaves no room for rebate claims’
Bombay High Court holds Splendor CHS managing committee ceased to be validly constituted — “Elected strength falling below two-third threshold creates statutory stalemate; meetings cannot continue”
Bombay High Court restores Section 28A compensation plea — ‘Beneficial provision cannot be defeated on a mere technicality; certified copy filed later must be considered’

Scroll to Top