Litigants Should Not Be Penalized for Counsel’s Defaults When Substantive Justice Is at Stake

Home - Litigants Should Not Be Penalized for Counsel’s Defaults When Substantive Justice Is at Stake

Posted inNews

Supreme Court Restores Interest on Enhanced Compensation for Procedural Delays: “Litigants Should Not Be Penalized for Counsel’s Defaults When Substantive Justice Is at Stake”

Court’s Decision: The Supreme Court partly allowed the appeal and modified the High Court's judgment. It restored interest on the enhanced compensation for the period from June 22, 2016, to…

Posted by

Rawlaw December 25, 2024

Recent News

Bombay High Court Holds Non-Signatory Group Company Cannot Be Dragged Into Arbitration Merely For Support Role: “Membership Of A Group Is Not Sufficient In Itself”; Section 37 Challenge Maintainable But Petition Dismissed On Merits
Bombay High Court: “Unsuccessful Party Can Also Seek Section 9 Protection”; L&T Directed To Keep ₹150 Crore Bank Guarantee Alive In ONGC Arbitration
“He Who Seeks Equity Must Do Equity”: Supreme Court Holds Specific Performance Decree Becomes Inexecutable If Balance Sale Consideration Is Not Deposited Within Time
Bombay High Court Rejects Tenants’ Plea To Add New Developer; Says Application Prima Facie Appears “Moved And Financed” By Proposed Developer, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs
Bombay High Court Refuses To Cancel Bail In Pending Murder Appeal; Says “Bail Once Granted Ought Not To Be Cancelled” Without Strong Grounds

Scroll to Top