Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news Raw Law

Unfiltered Legal Insights

  • News
  • Services for Advocates
  • Bookmarks
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Maintenance

Home - Maintenance - Page 2

mental cruelty
Posted inNews

Kerala High Court: “Ill-Treatment of Husband’s Children by Wife Constitutes Mental Cruelty”—Court Upholds Divorce, Enhances Maintenance to ₹15,000

Court’s Decision The Kerala High Court upheld the Family Court’s decree dissolving a Christian marriage on the ground of cruelty, holding that the wife’s continuous ill-treatment of the husband’s children…
Posted by Rawlaw October 13, 2025
maintenance
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court on Maintenance: “Financial incapacity of husband cannot be a ground to deny wife and child their right to maintenance” — Court stresses dignity, equality and sustenance under Section 125 of CrPC

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court’s order granting maintenance to a wife and her minor son under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The…
Posted by Rawlaw September 18, 2025
matrimonial dispute
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court: “Merely because the wife is earning does not bar maintenance – interim support must reflect parity in lifestyle” – Maintenance enhanced to ₹1.5 lakh for wife and child

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court partly allowed an appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, challenging a Family Court order that had denied maintenance to the…
Posted by Rawlaw September 11, 2025
Orissa High Court: "Strict Proof of Marriage Not Required Under Section 125 CrPC" – Maintenance of ₹5,000 Upheld as Petitioner Failed to Rebut Presumption of Marriage
Posted inNews

Orissa High Court: “Strict Proof of Marriage Not Required Under Section 125 CrPC” – Maintenance of ₹5,000 Upheld as Petitioner Failed to Rebut Presumption of Marriage

Court’s Decision: The Orissa High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging the Family Court's decision to grant maintenance of ₹5,000 per month to the opposite party (OP). The court emphasized…
Posted by Rawlaw November 22, 2024

Posts pagination

Previous page 1 2

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court: “Unsuccessful Party Can Also Seek Section 9 Protection”; L&T Directed To Keep ₹150 Crore Bank Guarantee Alive In ONGC Arbitration
  • “He Who Seeks Equity Must Do Equity”: Supreme Court Holds Specific Performance Decree Becomes Inexecutable If Balance Sale Consideration Is Not Deposited Within Time
  • Bombay High Court Rejects Tenants’ Plea To Add New Developer; Says Application Prima Facie Appears “Moved And Financed” By Proposed Developer, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs
  • Bombay High Court Refuses To Cancel Bail In Pending Murder Appeal; Says “Bail Once Granted Ought Not To Be Cancelled” Without Strong Grounds
  • Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against HDFC Bank And Phoenix ARC Officials Filed After Recovery Proceedings; Says “Personal Vendetta Writ Large”, Investigation Would Be Abuse Of Process
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top