Notification Can Be Challenged Separately”

Home » Notification Can Be Challenged Separately"

Posted inNews

Bombay High Court: Writ Petition Against IGST Demand and Limitation Extension Dismissed— “Statutory Remedies Must Be Exhausted First, Notification Can Be Challenged Separately”

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition, holding that the petitioner must first exhaust the statutory appellate remedy against the Order-in-Original (O-I-O) dated August 26, 2024. The…

Posted by

Rawlaw February 21, 2025

Recent News

Delhi High Court refuses to recall arbitrator appointment in Vedanta–GSPC gas dispute — foreign joint venture partner doesn’t convert case into international arbitration; jurisdictional objection premature, Section 16 remedy available
Supreme Court of India quashes minimum import price enforcement prior to Gazette publication — DGFT notification has no legal force until officially published; importers with prior letters of credit protected, appeals allowed
Delhi High Court orders perjury prosecution in arbitration fraud case — forged term sheet used to seek ₹490 crore interim relief; Section 340 invoked, Registrar directed to file complaint
Delhi High Court modifies MACT compensation in Oriental Insurance appeal — ITR-based income upheld, Pranay Sethi rationalisation applied; award reduced to ₹35.73 lakh
Delhi High Court partly sets aside arbitral award in brewery dispute — liquidated damages upheld as genuine pre-estimate; counterclaim for equipment rent revived due to ignored evidence

Scroll to Top