Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Property Law

Home » Property Law
Supreme-Court-Holds-Power-of-Attorney-Holder-Must-Comply-with-Mandatory-Authentication-Requirements-Under-Registration-Law-An-Agent-Never-Becomes-the-Executant-Merely-by-Signing-on-Behalf-of-Principal
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Holds Power of Attorney Holder Must Comply with Mandatory Authentication Requirements Under Registration Law: “An Agent Never Becomes the Executant Merely by Signing on Behalf of Principal”

Court’s Decision The Supreme Court in this case dealt with the crucial legal question concerning the registration of sale deeds executed through a power of attorney. The Court held that…
Posted by Rawlaw July 16, 2025
Karnataka-High-Court-Rejects-Title-Claim-Based-Solely-on-Revenue-Records-Mere-Entries-in-Revenue-Records-Do-Not-Establish-Ownership-and-Cannot-Override-Legal-Title-in-Immovable-Property-Matters
Posted inNews

Karnataka High Court Rejects Title Claim Based Solely on Revenue Records: “Mere Entries in Revenue Records Do Not Establish Ownership and Cannot Override Legal Title in Immovable Property Matters”

Court’s Decision The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the Regular Second Appeal, affirming the First Appellate Court's judgment which had set aside the Trial Court’s decree declaring the plaintiff as…
Posted by Rawlaw June 23, 2025
Chhattisgarh-High-Court-Sets-Aside-Appellate-Court-Decree-Granting-Possession-in-Ancestral-Property-Dispute—The-burden-to-prove-self-acquired-property-lies-on-the-person-who-asserts-such-acquisition
Posted inNews

Chhattisgarh High Court Sets Aside Appellate Court Decree Granting Possession in Ancestral Property Dispute—”The burden to prove self-acquired property lies on the person who asserts such acquisition.”

Court’s Decision The Chhattisgarh High Court, in SA No. 378 of 1992, allowed the second appeal preferred by the defendants and set aside the judgment and decree dated 08.08.1992 passed…
Posted by Rawlaw June 17, 2025

Recent News

  • Delhi High Court issues sweeping directions to curb trademark misuse through fraudulent domain names — “Registrars, banks, and government bodies bound to act, dynamic plus injunctions approved”
  • Delhi High Court issues landmark directions to dismantle fraudulent domain name ecosystem misusing well-known trademarks — “Online soul of businesses must be protected, systemic reforms mandated”
  • Delhi High Court holds London as the juridical seat and bars the Indian challenge to the foreign arbitral award — “Part I of the Arbitration Act excluded by necessary implication, Section 34 petition not maintainable”
  • Delhi High Court strikes down compulsory use of select bank EDC terminals at petrol pumps — “Exclusive payment routing held disproportionate, dealers’ business autonomy protected”
  • Delhi High Court orders rectification of trademark register by cancelling ‘BSM’ mark — “Prior user rights prevail over later registration, bad faith adoption inferred”
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top