Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Property Law

Home - Property Law

Supreme-Court-Holds-Power-of-Attorney-Holder-Must-Comply-with-Mandatory-Authentication-Requirements-Under-Registration-Law-An-Agent-Never-Becomes-the-Executant-Merely-by-Signing-on-Behalf-of-Principal
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Holds Power of Attorney Holder Must Comply with Mandatory Authentication Requirements Under Registration Law: “An Agent Never Becomes the Executant Merely by Signing on Behalf of Principal”

Court’s Decision The Supreme Court in this case dealt with the crucial legal question concerning the registration of sale deeds executed through a power of attorney. The Court held that…
Posted by Rawlaw July 16, 2025
Karnataka-High-Court-Rejects-Title-Claim-Based-Solely-on-Revenue-Records-Mere-Entries-in-Revenue-Records-Do-Not-Establish-Ownership-and-Cannot-Override-Legal-Title-in-Immovable-Property-Matters
Posted inNews

Karnataka High Court Rejects Title Claim Based Solely on Revenue Records: “Mere Entries in Revenue Records Do Not Establish Ownership and Cannot Override Legal Title in Immovable Property Matters”

Court’s Decision The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the Regular Second Appeal, affirming the First Appellate Court's judgment which had set aside the Trial Court’s decree declaring the plaintiff as…
Posted by Rawlaw June 23, 2025
Chhattisgarh-High-Court-Sets-Aside-Appellate-Court-Decree-Granting-Possession-in-Ancestral-Property-Dispute—The-burden-to-prove-self-acquired-property-lies-on-the-person-who-asserts-such-acquisition
Posted inNews

Chhattisgarh High Court Sets Aside Appellate Court Decree Granting Possession in Ancestral Property Dispute—”The burden to prove self-acquired property lies on the person who asserts such acquisition.”

Court’s Decision The Chhattisgarh High Court, in SA No. 378 of 1992, allowed the second appeal preferred by the defendants and set aside the judgment and decree dated 08.08.1992 passed…
Posted by Rawlaw June 17, 2025

Recent News

  • Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitration Agreement Requirements: “Mere Use of the Word ‘May’ Doesn’t Create Binding Arbitration Clause” — Appointment of Arbitrator Rejected Due to Absence of Mandatory Arbitration Clause
  • Supreme Court Acquits Death Row Convict for Lack of Evidence and Contradictory Eyewitness Testimony: “No Man Should Be Sent to the Gallows on Shaky Testimony”
  • Supreme Court: “Facade of Legitimacy for a Fraudulent Design” – Commercial Construction in Prohibited Zone Not Protected by Regularisation, Criminal Proceedings to Continue
  • Supreme Court Reiterates Strict Interpretation of Statutory Rights Under the Hindu Succession Act: “No Right Survives Once the Statutory Period Has Lapsed” – Appeal Dismissed for Being Time-Barred
  • Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence in Dowry-Murder Case: “When Death Penalty is Imposed Without Adhering to ‘Rarest of Rare’ Guidelines, It Becomes Arbitrary and Excessive”
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top