Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

” Quashes ₹119 Crore Demand and Penalty

Home » " Quashes ₹119 Crore Demand and Penalty
Supreme Court Analyzes Transaction Value Under the Central Excise Act: "Price Was Not the Sole Consideration for Sale Under MOU Between Oil Marketing Companies," Quashes ₹119 Crore Demand and Penalty
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Analyzes Transaction Value Under the Central Excise Act: “Price Was Not the Sole Consideration for Sale Under MOU Between Oil Marketing Companies,” Quashes ₹119 Crore Demand and Penalty

Court’s Decision: The court made the following key rulings: BPCL’s Appeal Allowed: In Civil Appeal No. 5642 of 2009, the court set aside the excise duty demand and penalty imposed…
Posted by Rawlaw January 20, 2025

Recent News

  • Delhi High Court refuses to recall arbitrator appointment in Vedanta–GSPC gas dispute — foreign joint venture partner doesn’t convert case into international arbitration; jurisdictional objection premature, Section 16 remedy available
  • Supreme Court of India quashes minimum import price enforcement prior to Gazette publication — DGFT notification has no legal force until officially published; importers with prior letters of credit protected, appeals allowed
  • Delhi High Court orders perjury prosecution in arbitration fraud case — forged term sheet used to seek ₹490 crore interim relief; Section 340 invoked, Registrar directed to file complaint
  • Delhi High Court modifies MACT compensation in Oriental Insurance appeal — ITR-based income upheld, Pranay Sethi rationalisation applied; award reduced to ₹35.73 lakh
  • Delhi High Court partly sets aside arbitral award in brewery dispute — liquidated damages upheld as genuine pre-estimate; counterclaim for equipment rent revived due to ignored evidence
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top