Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • News
  • Services for Advocates
  • Bookmarks
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

rash and negligent driving

Home - rash and negligent driving

accident
Posted inNews

“Merely because an accident has occurred, rashness or negligence cannot be presumed”: Delhi High Court dismisses State’s appeal against acquittal in triple-motorcycle collision case, holds injured eyewitness could not explain manner of accident after losing consciousness, rejects reliance on FIR drafted by IO, finds site plan inconclusive, and reiterates that benefit of doubt must go to accused in absence of cogent proof under Sections 279 and 304A IPC

HEADNOTE State (NCT of Delhi) v. Sanjay @ Anit @ Nita Singh Court: High Court of DelhiBench: Justice Neena Bansal KrishnaDate of Judgment: 15 December 2025Citation: CRL.A. 1544/2025 (CRL.L.P. 720/2017)Laws…
Posted by Rawlaw January 24, 2026
rash and negligent driving
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court quashes FIR for rash and negligent driving after compromise and noting minor injury “It would be in the interest of justice not to push the parties through trial”

HEADNOTE Case Title: Kaushlender Bhardwaj v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.Court: Delhi High CourtBench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Girish KathpaliaDate of Judgment: 21 January 2026Case Number: W.P. (Crl.) No. 222/2026…
Posted by Rawlaw January 21, 2026

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court: Party Can Directly Seek Arbitrator Under Section 11 Without First Invoking Section 8 Before Civil Court — “Pendency of Suit No Bar; Splitting of Remedies Argument Rejected”
  • Delhi High Court quashes attempt to murder case in guardian–ward dispute — “Justice must be tempered with mercy” — FIR set aside with community service direction
  • Supreme Court of India clarifies guarantor liability in cash credit overdrawal — “Surety discharged only for excess beyond sanctioned limit under Section 133, not entirely” — Appeal allowed
  • Delhi High Court quashes cross-FIRs in extended family dispute involving obscene content and assault — “Continuation would serve no useful purpose” — Proceedings set aside after settlement
  • Madras High Court orders attachment of borrower’s property under Section 9 — “Non-furnishing of security after arbitral award leads to protective relief” — Application allowed
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top