Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

refund

Home - refund

l & t finance
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court directs refund by L&T Finance: “Clause cannot override statutory obligation under Rule 7 of SARFAESI Rules” — Refund of excess sale amount directed to borrower

Court’s Decision: The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition by the borrower and directed L&T Finance Ltd. to refund the surplus amount of ₹4,00,000, which was received from the…
Posted by Rawlaw August 7, 2025
tax refund
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Reiterates: “Any Amount Paid Towards Tax Under Mistake of Law Must Be Refunded Without Delay” — Relief Granted to R K Tech for Unlawfully Collected Excise Duty on Freight Charges

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition filed by the petitioner-company challenging the rejection of its refund claim for excise duty paid on freight charges. The Court…
Posted by Rawlaw August 7, 2025
Bombay High Court Orders Refund with 10% Interest in E-Auction Dispute, Citing Bank’s Failure to Ensure Property Was Free from Legal Disputes and Undisclosed Litigation
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Orders Refund with 10% Interest in E-Auction Dispute, Citing Bank’s Failure to Ensure Property Was Free from Legal Disputes and Undisclosed Litigation

Court's Decision:The Bombay High Court ordered the refund of ₹5,03,42,000 to RVS Global Solutions Pvt. Ltd., the petitioner, along with 10% interest per annum from January 1, 2024. The Court…
Posted by Rawlaw September 7, 2024

Recent News

  • Delhi High Court restores probate and upholds mother’s final wishes — “Suspicious circumstances must be proved, not presumed; unproved allegations cannot defeat a validly executed Will”
  • Supreme Court upholds conviction for aggravated sexual assault on a 4-year-old child, holding that “Medical evidence cannot override consistent ocular testimony,” but reduces sentence from seven to six years
  • Bombay High Court clarifies that “Auction timelines are part of legal proceedings” and holds that the pandemic-period delay in depositing auction amounts stands protected under the Supreme Court’s exclusion order
  • Bombay high court affirms labour-friendly approach, holding that “When an employer does not dispute employment, the workman deserves full protection of industrial justice” in reinstatement appeal
  • Bombay high court upholds preventive detention, holding that “Verification by senior police officers offers sufficient assurance of genuineness” and personal verification by detaining authority is not required
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top