Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • News
  • Services for Advocates
  • Bookmarks
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Section 112

Home » Section 112
Patna High Court: “Disputed Questions of Fact Must Be Decided by Tribunal, Not Writ Court” — Writ Petition Withdrawn with Liberty, Interim Relief Directed Under Section 112 CGST/BGST Act
Posted inNews

Patna High Court: “Disputed Questions of Fact Must Be Decided by Tribunal, Not Writ Court” — Writ Petition Withdrawn with Liberty, Interim Relief Directed Under Section 112 CGST/BGST Act

Court’s Decision The Patna High Court refused to adjudicate on disputed factual issues concerning reversal of input tax credit (ITC) under the CGST/BGST Act, 2017, and permitted the petitioner to…
Posted by Rawlaw August 23, 2025

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court holds admitted documents dispense with proof — “Port Trust liable to refund illegal auction proceeds, ownership established by admissions”
  • Bombay High Court refuses to quash deemed conveyance despite fraud and title objections — “MOFA authority’s role is summary, civil court alone can decide ownership”
  • Bombay High Court upholds SIDBI pension cut-off date — “Denial of retrospective pension not arbitrary, policy choice backed by Supreme Court precedent”
  • Bombay High Court orders grant of deemed conveyance under MOFA — “Promoter’s delay defeated, statutory agreements prevail over disputed consents”
  • Delhi High Court denies residence order under Domestic Violence Act — “Voluntary relocation defeats claim to re-enter past shared household”
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top