Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

000

Home - 000

Karnataka High Court Affirms Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case: Complainant Fails to Prove Financial Capacity to Lend ₹6,35,000, Accused Successfully Rebuts Presumption Under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act
Posted inNews

Karnataka High Court Affirms Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case: Complainant Fails to Prove Financial Capacity to Lend ₹6,35,000, Accused Successfully Rebuts Presumption Under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act

Court’s Decision The Karnataka High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the complainant against the trial court’s judgment acquitting the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881…
Posted by Rawlaw March 6, 2025
Supreme Court Enhances Motor Accident Compensation to ₹37.51 Lakhs: Fixes Monthly Income at ₹10,000, Recognizes 100% Functional Disability, Overrules Lower Courts' Findings, and Revises Awards for Pain, Suffering, and Future Prospects
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Enhances Motor Accident Compensation to ₹37.51 Lakhs: Fixes Monthly Income at ₹10,000, Recognizes 100% Functional Disability, Overrules Lower Courts’ Findings, and Revises Awards for Pain, Suffering, and Future Prospects

Court’s Decision The Supreme Court of India allowed the appeal filed by the claimant, revising the compensation awarded in a motor accident case to ₹37,51,000. It fixed the claimant's monthly…
Posted by Rawlaw February 11, 2025
Bombay High Court Dismisses Fraudulent Property Suit: Plaintiff Fails to Prove Ancestral Ownership, Misuses Jurisdiction, and Penalized ₹25,000
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Dismisses Fraudulent Property Suit: Plaintiff Fails to Prove Ancestral Ownership, Misuses Jurisdiction, and Penalized ₹25,000

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) overturned the decisions of the lower courts, dismissing the plaintiff's suit regarding two properties, located in Nagpur and Pandhurna. The court held…
Posted by Rawlaw January 13, 2025

Recent News

  • CESTAT New Delhi holds that “no question arises for granting interest from date of deposit” — Tribunal clarifies that interest on refund of differential customs duty applies only under Section 27A and not Section 35FF
  • Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal: “Export Is Complete the Moment Goods Cross India’s Borders” — Tribunal Quashes Confiscation and Restores Drawback for Shipments Diverted to Dubai, Rejects Revenue’s Reliance on RBI Circular
  • CESTAT: “Suspicion Cannot Replace Proof” — Tribunal Sets Aside Confiscation and Penalties After Finding No Evidence of Overvaluation in Export Incentive Case
  • CESTAT holds that “a person cannot be placed in a more grievous situation for exercising appellate remedy” — Tribunal sets aside confiscation, redemption fine, and duty demand while restoring exemption under ASEAN-India FTA
  • Supreme Court of India holds that “we find no good reason to interfere with the impugned order” — Apex Court upholds CESTAT’s ruling in indirect tax dispute and dismisses appeal filed by revenue authorities
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top