300A

Home - 300A

Posted inNews

Bombay High Court: Panvel 75% premium FSI clause upheld — “Clause 10.16 is a policy choice within Section 22(m) powers; no violation of Articles 14, 265 or 300A”

Court’s decision The Bombay High Court upheld the validity of the Notification dated 7 October 2024 issued under Section 37(1AA)(c) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, inserting…

Posted by

Rawlaw February 14, 2026

Posted inNews

Kerala High Court: “Government Cannot Take Private Property Without Compensation” – High Court Reiterates Fundamental Right to Property Cannot Be Taken Away Arbitrarily Under Article 300A

Court’s Decision The Kerala High Court emphatically held that the petitioner’s right to property under Article 300A of the Constitution was violated by the unauthorized acquisition and use of the…

Posted by

Rawlaw August 2, 2025

Recent News

Bombay High Court Quashes FIRs Against Special Public Prosecutor And Others, Says Police Cannot Investigate Advocate Misconduct At Instance Of Private Complainant
Bombay High Court Sets Aside MPID Auction Sale In NSEL-Linked Property Matter, Says “This Is A Scam Within The Scam”; Orders Fresh Valuation, Re-Auction And Probe Against Competent Authority & Valuer
Bombay High Court Holds Non-Signatory Group Company Cannot Be Dragged Into Arbitration Merely For Support Role: “Membership Of A Group Is Not Sufficient In Itself”; Section 37 Challenge Maintainable But Petition Dismissed On Merits
Bombay High Court: “Unsuccessful Party Can Also Seek Section 9 Protection”; L&T Directed To Keep ₹150 Crore Bank Guarantee Alive In ONGC Arbitration
“He Who Seeks Equity Must Do Equity”: Supreme Court Holds Specific Performance Decree Becomes Inexecutable If Balance Sale Consideration Is Not Deposited Within Time

Scroll to Top