Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

406

Home » 406
marriage litigation
Posted inNews

‘Putting Matrimonial Litigations to Rest Serves the Ends of Justice’ — Delhi High Court Quashes 498A/406 Case After Full Settlement & Completion of Divorce

COURT’S DECISION The Court exercised its inherent jurisdiction under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and quashed the FIR registered for offences under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, along with…
Posted by Rawlaw November 8, 2025
Calcutta High Court Quashes Proceedings Under Sections 420, 406, and 120B IPC: Reaffirms That Non-Payment of Dues Without Criminal Intent Is a Civil Dispute and Not Cheating or Breach of Trust
Posted inNews

Calcutta High Court Quashes Proceedings Under Sections 420, 406, and 120B IPC: Reaffirms That Non-Payment of Dues Without Criminal Intent Is a Civil Dispute and Not Cheating or Breach of Trust

Court’s Decision The Calcutta High Court quashed the proceedings in Complaint Case No. CNS 3902 of 2022 under Sections 420 (cheating), 406 (criminal breach of trust), and 120B (criminal conspiracy)…
Posted by Rawlaw January 15, 2025

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court curtails Charity Commissioner’s overreach under public trust law — “Section 41A is about property and income, not moral correction,” apology direction quashed
  • Bombay High Court upholds quashing of stop-work notice under municipal law — “Authority must pass a reasoned order after reply; vague notices cannot stand,” appeal dismissed
  • Bombay High Court rejects MSME restructuring plea for ₹30 crore loan — “Eligibility under RBI revival framework hinges on loan limit, not outstanding exposure,” writ petition dismissed
  • Bombay High Court upholds arbitral award granting escalation despite restrictive clauses — “A defaulting employer cannot hide behind no-compensation terms,” commercial arbitration appeal dismissed
  • Bombay High Court refuses to appoint arbitrator for railway contract disputes exceeding 20% cap — “Party autonomy permits selective arbitrability; court cannot compel arbitration beyond agreed threshold,” Section 11 application dismissed
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top