Delhi High Court Upholds Maintainability of Suit for Declaration and Cancellation of Sale Deed Without Possession: Affirms Jurisdictional Bar Under Section 50 of the Delhi Rent Control Act and Dismisses Second Appeal for Lack of Substantial Question of Law Under Section 100 CPC

Delhi High Court Upholds Maintainability of Suit for Declaration and Cancellation of Sale Deed Without Possession: Affirms Jurisdictional Bar Under Section 50 of the Delhi Rent Control Act and Dismisses Second Appeal for Lack of Substantial Question of Law Under Section 100 CPC

Court's Decision The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeals filed by the appellant/defendant and upheld the judgment of the first appellate court. The court held that the suit for declaration…
Karnataka High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC: Directs Trial Court to Determine Whether Plaintiffs’ Declaration Claim is Barred by Limitation Under Article 59 of the Limitation Act, Ensuring Fair Adjudication of Dispute

Karnataka High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC: Directs Trial Court to Determine Whether Plaintiffs’ Declaration Claim is Barred by Limitation Under Article 59 of the Limitation Act, Ensuring Fair Adjudication of Dispute

Court’s Decision: The Karnataka High Court allowed the writ petition filed by the plaintiffs and overturned the trial court’s order that rejected their application under Order VI Rule 17 of…
Orissa High Court's Ruling on E-Appeal Filing and Delay Condonation in Income Tax Matters: Allows Taxpayer to Refile Appeal Electronically After Manual Filing Dismissal, Stays Attachment Order, and Emphasizes Fair Adjudication Over Procedural Technicalities

Orissa High Court’s Ruling on E-Appeal Filing and Delay Condonation in Income Tax Matters: Allows Taxpayer to Refile Appeal Electronically After Manual Filing Dismissal, Stays Attachment Order, and Emphasizes Fair Adjudication Over Procedural Technicalities

Court’s Decision The Orissa High Court ruled that the petitioner should be allowed to file an electronic appeal (e-appeal) even after the original manual appeal was dismissed as invalid. The…
Gauhati High Court Rules in Favor of Petitioner, Directs Authorities to Extend Old Pension Scheme (OPS) Benefits, Holding That Initial Appointment Date, Not Subsequent Regularization, Determines Pension Eligibility—Declares NPS Undertaking Non-Binding and Affirms Accrued Pension Rights

Gauhati High Court Rules in Favor of Petitioner, Directs Authorities to Extend Old Pension Scheme (OPS) Benefits, Holding That Initial Appointment Date, Not Subsequent Regularization, Determines Pension Eligibility—Declares NPS Undertaking Non-Binding and Affirms Accrued Pension Rights

Court’s Decision The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the respondent authorities to extend pensionary benefits under the Old Pension Scheme (OPS). The Court held that the…