Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

433/- Under Order XXXVII CPC: “Failure to Enter Appearance Within Prescribed Time Bars Defendant from Contesting Suit; Fraud Plea Legally Untenable”

Home - 433/- Under Order XXXVII CPC: "Failure to Enter Appearance Within Prescribed Time Bars Defendant from Contesting Suit; Fraud Plea Legally Untenable"

Delhi High Court Upholds Summary Decree of ₹7,01,433/- Under Order XXXVII CPC: "Failure to Enter Appearance Within Prescribed Time Bars Defendant from Contesting Suit; Fraud Plea Legally Untenable"
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Upholds Summary Decree of ₹7,01,433/- Under Order XXXVII CPC: “Failure to Enter Appearance Within Prescribed Time Bars Defendant from Contesting Suit; Fraud Plea Legally Untenable”

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the summary decree for ₹7,01,433/-, ruling that: The appellant failed to enter appearance within the prescribed time under Order XXXVII…
Posted by Rawlaw February 4, 2025

Recent News

  • CESTAT New Delhi holds that “no question arises for granting interest from date of deposit” — Tribunal clarifies that interest on refund of differential customs duty applies only under Section 27A and not Section 35FF
  • Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal: “Export Is Complete the Moment Goods Cross India’s Borders” — Tribunal Quashes Confiscation and Restores Drawback for Shipments Diverted to Dubai, Rejects Revenue’s Reliance on RBI Circular
  • CESTAT: “Suspicion Cannot Replace Proof” — Tribunal Sets Aside Confiscation and Penalties After Finding No Evidence of Overvaluation in Export Incentive Case
  • CESTAT holds that “a person cannot be placed in a more grievous situation for exercising appellate remedy” — Tribunal sets aside confiscation, redemption fine, and duty demand while restoring exemption under ASEAN-India FTA
  • Supreme Court of India holds that “we find no good reason to interfere with the impugned order” — Apex Court upholds CESTAT’s ruling in indirect tax dispute and dismisses appeal filed by revenue authorities
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top