Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

498A/406 IPC

Home » 498A/406 IPC
matrimonial dispute
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court: “Matrimonial disputes should be put to a quietus if parties have amicably resolved their differences” – FIR under Sections 498A/406 IPC quashed after divorce and full settlement

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court allowed a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), quashing FIR No. 236/2023 registered under Sections 498A, 406, and 34…
Posted by Rawlaw September 11, 2025
matrimonial dispute
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court: “Cases arising out of matrimonial differences should be put to a quietus if parties have amicably resolved” – FIR under Sections 498A/406 IPC quashed after full settlement and divorce

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court allowed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), quashing FIR No. 572/2020…
Posted by Rawlaw September 11, 2025

Recent News

  • Delhi High Court issues sweeping directions to curb trademark misuse through fraudulent domain names — “Registrars, banks, and government bodies bound to act, dynamic plus injunctions approved”
  • Delhi High Court issues landmark directions to dismantle fraudulent domain name ecosystem misusing well-known trademarks — “Online soul of businesses must be protected, systemic reforms mandated”
  • Delhi High Court holds London as the juridical seat and bars the Indian challenge to the foreign arbitral award — “Part I of the Arbitration Act excluded by necessary implication, Section 34 petition not maintainable”
  • Delhi High Court strikes down compulsory use of select bank EDC terminals at petrol pumps — “Exclusive payment routing held disproportionate, dealers’ business autonomy protected”
  • Delhi High Court orders rectification of trademark register by cancelling ‘BSM’ mark — “Prior user rights prevail over later registration, bad faith adoption inferred”
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top