Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Abetment of Suicide

Home - Abetment of Suicide

The High Court of Kerala: “Instigation must have a clear nexus”: powerful ruling refusing to quash abetment of suicide prosecution under Section 306
Posted inNews

The High Court of Kerala: “Instigation must have a clear nexus”: powerful ruling refusing to quash abetment of suicide prosecution under Section 306

Court’s decision The High Court of Kerala dismissed a petition seeking to quash criminal proceedings for abetment of suicide under Section 306 read with Section 113, holding that the allegations…
Posted by Rawlaw November 8, 2025
abetment of suicide
Posted inNews

Kerala High Court Upholds Conviction in Abetment of Suicide Case—“Dying Declaration of Victim Inspires Confidence; Accused’s Acts Left Her With No Other Option”

Court’s Decision The Kerala High Court dismissed the criminal appeal filed by the accused challenging his conviction under Sections 452, 354, and 306 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), upholding…
Posted by Rawlaw June 16, 2025

Recent News

  • Delhi High Court restores probate and upholds mother’s final wishes — “Suspicious circumstances must be proved, not presumed; unproved allegations cannot defeat a validly executed Will”
  • Supreme Court upholds conviction for aggravated sexual assault on a 4-year-old child, holding that “Medical evidence cannot override consistent ocular testimony,” but reduces sentence from seven to six years
  • Bombay High Court clarifies that “Auction timelines are part of legal proceedings” and holds that the pandemic-period delay in depositing auction amounts stands protected under the Supreme Court’s exclusion order
  • Bombay high court affirms labour-friendly approach, holding that “When an employer does not dispute employment, the workman deserves full protection of industrial justice” in reinstatement appeal
  • Bombay high court upholds preventive detention, holding that “Verification by senior police officers offers sufficient assurance of genuineness” and personal verification by detaining authority is not required
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top