Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Acquits Appellant in Abduction Case Under Section 366-A IPC: Prosecution Fails to Prove Victim’s Minority and Coercion Beyond Reasonable Doubt

Home - Acquits Appellant in Abduction Case Under Section 366-A IPC: Prosecution Fails to Prove Victim’s Minority and Coercion Beyond Reasonable Doubt

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Abduction Case Under Section 366-A IPC: Prosecution Fails to Prove Victim’s Minority and Coercion Beyond Reasonable Doubt, Emphasizes Need for Reliable Evidence in Age Determination
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Abduction Case Under Section 366-A IPC: Prosecution Fails to Prove Victim’s Minority and Coercion Beyond Reasonable Doubt, Emphasizes Need for Reliable Evidence in Age Determination

Court’s Decision The Supreme Court of India overturned the appellant's conviction under Section 366-A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which penalizes the abduction of a minor girl for illicit…
Posted by Rawlaw February 11, 2025

Recent News

  • CESTAT New Delhi holds that “no question arises for granting interest from date of deposit” — Tribunal clarifies that interest on refund of differential customs duty applies only under Section 27A and not Section 35FF
  • Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal: “Export Is Complete the Moment Goods Cross India’s Borders” — Tribunal Quashes Confiscation and Restores Drawback for Shipments Diverted to Dubai, Rejects Revenue’s Reliance on RBI Circular
  • CESTAT: “Suspicion Cannot Replace Proof” — Tribunal Sets Aside Confiscation and Penalties After Finding No Evidence of Overvaluation in Export Incentive Case
  • CESTAT holds that “a person cannot be placed in a more grievous situation for exercising appellate remedy” — Tribunal sets aside confiscation, redemption fine, and duty demand while restoring exemption under ASEAN-India FTA
  • Supreme Court of India holds that “we find no good reason to interfere with the impugned order” — Apex Court upholds CESTAT’s ruling in indirect tax dispute and dismisses appeal filed by revenue authorities
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top