Adverse Possession Requires Trial to Prove Essential Conditions

Home » Adverse Possession Requires Trial to Prove Essential Conditions

Posted inNews

Calcutta High Court: Adverse Possession Requires Trial to Prove Essential Conditions; Rejection of Plaint Under Order 7 Rule 11 Must Be Based Solely on Plaint’s Averments

Court's Decision The Calcutta High Court dismissed the defendant's civil revision application challenging the trial court's order that refused to dismiss the plaintiffs' suit under Order 7 Rule 11 of…

Posted by

Rawlaw November 26, 2024

Recent News

Bombay High Court holds admitted documents dispense with proof — “Port Trust liable to refund illegal auction proceeds, ownership established by admissions”
Bombay High Court refuses to quash deemed conveyance despite fraud and title objections — “MOFA authority’s role is summary, civil court alone can decide ownership”
Bombay High Court upholds SIDBI pension cut-off date — “Denial of retrospective pension not arbitrary, policy choice backed by Supreme Court precedent”
Bombay High Court orders grant of deemed conveyance under MOFA — “Promoter’s delay defeated, statutory agreements prevail over disputed consents”
Delhi High Court denies residence order under Domestic Violence Act — “Voluntary relocation defeats claim to re-enter past shared household”

Scroll to Top