Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Affirms ₹13.36 Lakh Compensation in Motor Accident Case; Holds Family Pension Cannot Be Deducted as It Is Not a “Pecuniary Advantage” Under the Motor Vehicles Act

Home - Affirms ₹13.36 Lakh Compensation in Motor Accident Case; Holds Family Pension Cannot Be Deducted as It Is Not a "Pecuniary Advantage" Under the Motor Vehicles Act

Delhi High Court Affirms ₹13.36 Lakh Compensation in Motor Accident Case; Holds Family Pension Cannot Be Deducted as It Is Not a "Pecuniary Advantage" Under the Motor Vehicles Act
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Affirms ₹13.36 Lakh Compensation in Motor Accident Case; Holds Family Pension Cannot Be Deducted as It Is Not a “Pecuniary Advantage” Under the Motor Vehicles Act

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the insurance company, affirming the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's (MACT) award of ₹13,36,140 with 7% interest to the claimants—the…
Posted by Rawlaw January 22, 2025

Recent News

  • Supreme Court Grants Regular Pay Scale to Temporary Employees Appointed Under Special Recruitment Drive, Sets Aside Madhya Pradesh High Court’s Division Bench Judgment for Arbitrary Denial of Benefits
  • Bombay High Court: Liquidated Damages Cannot Be Automatically Enforced—Award of ₹6,01,000 Reduced to ₹3,00,000 as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Actual Loss, Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act Applied to Limit Compensation
  • Supreme Court Quashes Rape FIR Against Husband, Holds That Exception 2 to Section 375 IPC Applies in Legally Recognized Marriages and SIT Report Corroborates Voluntary Marriage
  • Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutionality of Section 73AAA of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960; Rejects Challenge to Restriction on Number of Directors in Tribal Development Corporation
  • Delhi High Court Quashes Time-Barred Reassessment Proceedings: Holds That Notices Issued Beyond Limitation Period Under Section 149(1) Are Invalid Despite TOLA Extensions
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top