Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Amendment of Pleadings

Home - Amendment of Pleadings

Delhi-High-Court-Allows-Amendment-of-Plaint-at-Pre-Trial-Stage-Amendment-Applications-Should-Be-Liberally-Considered-If-They-Do-Not-Change-The-Nature-Of-The-Suit
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint at Pre-Trial Stage: “Amendment Applications Should Be Liberally Considered If They Do Not Change The Nature Of The Suit”

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s application under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, setting aside the trial court’s order that had dismissed…
Posted by Rawlaw July 6, 2025
Karnataka-High-Court-Holds-Court-Fee-on-Amended-Relief-Must-Be-Paid-as-per-Market-Value-on-Date-of-Original-Suit-Amendment-Relates-Back-Fresh-Valuation-on-Amendment-Date-is-Legally-Unsustainable
Posted inNews

Karnataka High Court Holds Court Fee on Amended Relief Must Be Paid as per Market Value on Date of Original Suit: “Amendment Relates Back, Fresh Valuation on Amendment Date is Legally Unsustainable”

Court’s Decision The Karnataka High Court, in a judgment dated 2 June 2025, allowed the writ petition and quashed the Trial Court’s order that directed the plaintiff to value the…
Posted by Rawlaw June 19, 2025

Recent News

  • “Comparable Sale Instances Must Prevail” – Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation After Finding Reference Court Erred in Ignoring Higher Valuation Evidence
  • “Arbitration Award Set Aside: Bombay High Court Slams ‘Denial of Natural Justice’ and Declares ‘An Arbitrator Must Give Reasons’ in a Powerful Ruling on Fundamental Policy Breach”
  • “Recovery Certificate Invalidated: Bombay High Court Issues a Powerful Warning That ‘Reasons Are the Soul of Justice’ While Reiterating That ‘A Registrar Must Apply His Mind Before Enforcing Recovery’”
  • Bombay High Court Declares That “A Clean Document Cannot Coexist With a Tainted Transaction,” Sets Aside Conviction After Finding Critical Contradictions in Evidence
  • Recovery Certificate under Section 101 Set Aside: Bombay High Court Holds That “Recording of Reasons Is a Fundamental Requirement” and Directs Denovo Inquiry for Non-Compliance with Rule 86A–86F
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top