an Anathema to Environmental Jurisprudence — No Development at the Cost of Environment”

Home - an Anathema to Environmental Jurisprudence — No Development at the Cost of Environment”

Posted inNews

Supreme Court Strikes Down Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearances as Unconstitutional: “Violation of Article 21, an Anathema to Environmental Jurisprudence — No Development at the Cost of Environment”

Court’s Decision The Supreme Court struck down the 2017 Notification and the 2021 Office Memorandum (OM) permitting ex post facto Environmental Clearances (ECs), declaring them “completely arbitrary and illegal” and…

Posted by

Rawlaw May 19, 2025

Recent News

Delhi High Court holds AIIMS cannot deny super-speciality admission despite 1095-day tenure — “Post-MD senior residency must be counted”; appeal dismissed on last date of admission
Supreme Court of India clarifies surety liability under contract law — “Discharge under Section 133 is only for transactions after variance”; guarantors liable up to sanctioned limit
Delhi High Court allows Britannia to amend plaint and implead trademark proprietor — “Perjury requires deliberate falsehood, not inadvertent error”; criminal plea dismissed
Delhi High Court refuses injunction against ‘Baby Forest’ — “Forest Essentials is a composite mark; no monopoly over ‘forest’”; appeal dismissed
Delhi High Court grants injunction to GlaxoSmithKline against ‘FEXIT’ marks — “Phonetic similarity in medicines demands stricter scrutiny”; Zee Laboratories restrained

Scroll to Top