Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Appellant’s Land Was Sold Through Mutual Consent

Home - Appellant’s Land Was Sold Through Mutual Consent

Chhattisgarh HC Clarifies Legal Distinction Between Voluntary Sales and Acquisitions; Appellant’s Land Was Sold Through Mutual Consent, Not Acquired, and Compensation Benefits Apply Only to Land Acquisitions
Posted inNews

Chhattisgarh High Court Clarifies Legal Distinction Between Voluntary Sales and Acquisitions; Appellant’s Land Was Sold Through Mutual Consent, Not Acquired, and Compensation Benefits Apply Only to Land Acquisitions

Court’s Decision The Chhattisgarh High Court upheld the decision of the learned Single Judge, dismissing the writ appeal filed by the appellant. The court ruled that the appellant, having voluntarily…
Posted by Rawlaw December 5, 2024

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court Upholds Tilaknagar Industries’ Exclusive Rights Over “Mansion House” and “Savoy Club” Trademarks, Restrains Allied Blenders and Distillers from Use, Reaffirming 2011 Judgment
  • Delhi High Court Upholds Maintainability of Suit for Declaration and Cancellation of Sale Deed Without Possession: Affirms Jurisdictional Bar Under Section 50 of the Delhi Rent Control Act and Dismisses Second Appeal for Lack of Substantial Question of Law Under Section 100 CPC
  • Karnataka High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC: Directs Trial Court to Determine Whether Plaintiffs’ Declaration Claim is Barred by Limitation Under Article 59 of the Limitation Act, Ensuring Fair Adjudication of Dispute
  • Kerala High Court Dismisses Challenge to High Powered Committee’s Jurisdiction: Affirms Supreme Court’s Pan India Authority Over Elephant Welfare, Transfer, and Rehabilitation, Rejects Per Incuriam Claim Against National Oversight
  • Delhi High Court Dismisses State’s Appeal Against Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case: Upholds Double Presumption of Innocence and Rules That Variance in Public Analyst and CFL Reports Weakens Prosecution’s Case Under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top