Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Bombay High Court Grants Relief to 93 BHMS Students Denied Degrees Due to CET/NEET Technicality — “After 10 Years

Home - Bombay High Court Grants Relief to 93 BHMS Students Denied Degrees Due to CET/NEET Technicality — “After 10 Years

Bombay High Court Grants Relief to 93 BHMS Students Denied Degrees Due to CET/NEET Technicality — “After 10 Years, Students Deserve Closure”: Admissions Made in Transitional Phase Upheld, But Judgment Not to Be Treated as Precedent
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Grants Relief to 93 BHMS Students Denied Degrees Due to CET/NEET Technicality — “After 10 Years, Students Deserve Closure”: Admissions Made in Transitional Phase Upheld, But Judgment Not to Be Treated as Precedent

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court quashed and set aside communications and decisions issued by MUHS and Pravesh Niyantran Samiti that disapproved the admission of 93 students to BHMS courses…
Posted by Rawlaw May 27, 2025

Recent News

  • CESTAT New Delhi holds that “no question arises for granting interest from date of deposit” — Tribunal clarifies that interest on refund of differential customs duty applies only under Section 27A and not Section 35FF
  • Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal: “Export Is Complete the Moment Goods Cross India’s Borders” — Tribunal Quashes Confiscation and Restores Drawback for Shipments Diverted to Dubai, Rejects Revenue’s Reliance on RBI Circular
  • CESTAT: “Suspicion Cannot Replace Proof” — Tribunal Sets Aside Confiscation and Penalties After Finding No Evidence of Overvaluation in Export Incentive Case
  • CESTAT holds that “a person cannot be placed in a more grievous situation for exercising appellate remedy” — Tribunal sets aside confiscation, redemption fine, and duty demand while restoring exemption under ASEAN-India FTA
  • Supreme Court of India holds that “we find no good reason to interfere with the impugned order” — Apex Court upholds CESTAT’s ruling in indirect tax dispute and dismisses appeal filed by revenue authorities
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top