Bombay High Court: “Existence of arbitration clause is sufficient under Section 11; SARFAESI and arbitration can run in parallel, and belated civil suit appears to be a delaying tactic” – Mortgage dispute with fraud and forgery allegations referred to arbitration, questions left to arbitrator under Section 16
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court: “Existence of arbitration clause is sufficient under Section 11; SARFAESI and arbitration can run in parallel, and belated civil suit appears to be a delaying tactic” – Mortgage dispute with fraud and forgery allegations referred to arbitration, questions left to arbitrator under Section 16

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court allowed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, appointing Justice (Retd.) Naresh H. Patil, former Chief Justice of the…
Bombay High Court dismisses appeal and upholds conviction under Sections 302 and 309 IPC: “Once prosecution proved that the deceased died inside matrimonial home with accused present, burden shifted to him to explain circumstances; daughter turning hostile no ground for acquittal
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court dismisses appeal and upholds conviction under Sections 302 and 309 IPC: “Once prosecution proved that the deceased died inside matrimonial home with accused present, burden shifted to him to explain circumstances; daughter turning hostile no ground for acquittal

Court’s Decision The Division Bench of the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) comprising Justices Nitin B. Suryawanshi and Sandipkumar C. More dismissed a criminal appeal filed by the accused challenging…