Bombay High Court Upholds BMC’s Demolition Notice on Mercedes-Benz Workshop Premises But Restricts Action to Illegal Additions — “Extensions So Extensive, It’s Difficult to Distinguish Old from New; Demolition Must Spare Original Structure and Permissible Repairs''
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Upholds BMC’s Demolition Notice on Mercedes-Benz Workshop Premises But Restricts Action to Illegal Additions — “Extensions So Extensive, It’s Difficult to Distinguish Old from New; Demolition Must Spare Original Structure and Permissible Repairs”

Court’s Decision: The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the BMC’s notice and demolition order under Section 351(1A) of the BMC Act. The Court upheld the BMC's action…
May 26, 2025
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Against Private Developer for Alternate Permanent Accommodation — “Developer Not ‘State’ Under Article 12; Dispute Is Private and Contractual, No Writ Under Article 226 Lies”
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Against Private Developer for Alternate Permanent Accommodation — “Developer Not ‘State’ Under Article 12; Dispute Is Private and Contractual, No Writ Under Article 226 Lies”

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking directions against a private developer for executing individual supplementary agreements for alternate permanent accommodation and compensation. The Court held…
May 26, 2025
Bombay High Court Holds Rejection of Compassionate Pension Arbitrary: “Absenteeism Not a Disentitling Misconduct, Petitioner’s Condition Warrants Special Consideration” — Directs Mumbai Port Authority to Grant Pension Under MBPT Pension Regulations, 1965
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Holds Rejection of Compassionate Pension Arbitrary: “Absenteeism Not a Disentitling Misconduct, Petitioner’s Condition Warrants Special Consideration” — Directs Mumbai Port Authority to Grant Pension Under MBPT Pension Regulations, 1965

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court quashed the decision of the Mumbai Port Authority rejecting the petitioner’s request for compassionate pension and retirement benefits. It held that the petitioner was…
May 21, 2025
Bombay High Court Dismisses Larsen & Toubro’s Challenge to ₹8,000 Crore Tunnel Tender: “Suppression of Relevant Facts Disqualifies Party from Equitable Relief” — Accepted Confidentiality Clauses Bar Midway Interference, No Violation of Natural Justice
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Dismisses Larsen & Toubro’s Challenge to ₹8,000 Crore Tunnel Tender: “Suppression of Relevant Facts Disqualifies Party from Equitable Relief” — Accepted Confidentiality Clauses Bar Midway Interference, No Violation of Natural Justice

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking to restrain the Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) from opening financial bids in the ₹8,000 crore Gaimukh–Fountain underground…
May 21, 2025