Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Bombay High Court

Home - Bombay High Court - Page 42

Bombay High Court Rejects MCGM's Delay Plea in Land Compensation Appeals, Declines to Extend Statutory 120-Day Limit Under Section 74 of the 2013 Act
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Rejects MCGM’s Delay Plea in Land Compensation Appeals, Declines to Extend Statutory 120-Day Limit Under Section 74 of the 2013 Act

Court’s Decision: The Bombay High Court dismissed the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai's (MCGM) applications for condonation of delay in filing appeals under Section 74 of the Right to Fair…
Posted by Rawlaw January 10, 2025
Bombay High Court Acquits Driver in Fatal Highway Accident Case, Citing Lack of Evidence for Rash or Negligent Driving
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Acquits Driver in Fatal Highway Accident Case, Citing Lack of Evidence for Rash or Negligent Driving

Court’s Decision: The Bombay High Court allowed the Criminal Revision Application and quashed the convictions under Sections 304-A (causing death by negligence) and 279 (rash driving) of the IPC and…
Posted by Rawlaw January 10, 2025
Bombay High Court Affirms Reassessment Proceedings for Undisclosed Income, Emphasizes Jurisdictional Limits and Right to Appeal
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Affirms Reassessment Proceedings for Undisclosed Income, Emphasizes Jurisdictional Limits and Right to Appeal

Court’s Decision: The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court concluded that the petitioner’s objections…
Posted by Rawlaw January 10, 2025
Bombay High Court Rejects Developer's Claim for Additional TDR, Emphasizes Mandatory Compliance with DCPR 2034 Regulations
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Rejects Developer’s Claim for Additional TDR, Emphasizes Mandatory Compliance with DCPR 2034 Regulations

Court’s Decision The High Court of Bombay dismissed the petition, stating that the petitioner cannot claim benefits under the new DCPR 2034 without fully or partially converting the project to…
Posted by Rawlaw January 10, 2025
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction: Stops Use of "Tikha Lal" Brand for Copying Well-Known "Tikhalal" Trademark, Cites Deceptive Similarity and Fabricated Evidence
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction: Stops Use of “Tikha Lal” Brand for Copying Well-Known “Tikhalal” Trademark, Cites Deceptive Similarity and Fabricated Evidence

Court's Decision: The Bombay High Court granted an interim injunction against the defendants, restraining them from using the trademark "Tikha Lal," finding it deceptively similar to the plaintiff's registered trademark…
Posted by Rawlaw January 10, 2025
Bombay High Court Ends Judicial Monitoring in Govind Pansare Murder Case: Directs Expedited Trial as Investigation Substantially Complete
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Ends Judicial Monitoring in Govind Pansare Murder Case: Directs Expedited Trial as Investigation Substantially Complete

Court's Decision The Bombay High Court dismissed the petition for continued judicial monitoring of the investigation into the 2015 murder of activist Govind Pansare. The Court concluded that the investigation,…
Posted by Rawlaw January 9, 2025
Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case: "Presumption Under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act Rebutted as Complainant Failed to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt"
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case: “Presumption Under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act Rebutted as Complainant Failed to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt”

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court upheld the trial court's acquittal of the accused in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court ruled that…
Posted by Rawlaw January 9, 2025
Bombay High Court Directs Compensation for Railway Accident: "Absence of Ticket Does Not Negate Bonafide Passenger Status," Declares Fall from Overcrowded Train an "Untoward Incident"
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Directs Compensation for Railway Accident: “Absence of Ticket Does Not Negate Bonafide Passenger Status,” Declares Fall from Overcrowded Train an “Untoward Incident”

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court overturned the Railway Claims Tribunal's rejection of a compensation claim, holding that the appellants—the parents of a deceased passenger—had sufficiently proven their entitlement under…
Posted by Rawlaw January 9, 2025
Bombay High Court Upholds Maintainability of Suit for Partition and Separate Possession: "Dismissal of Previous Suit Does Not Bar Plaintiffs' Right to Seek New Reliefs"
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Upholds Maintainability of Suit for Partition and Separate Possession: “Dismissal of Previous Suit Does Not Bar Plaintiffs’ Right to Seek New Reliefs”

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Application (CRA) No. 275 of 2023. It upheld the trial court’s order, which rejected the defendants' application for dismissal of…
Posted by Rawlaw January 8, 2025
Bombay High Court Upholds Trial Court Decision: Refuses to Reject Property Dispute Suit Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, Citing Triable Issues Over Competing Sale Deeds and Alleged Injunction Violations
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Upholds Trial Court Decision: Refuses to Reject Property Dispute Suit Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, Citing Triable Issues Over Competing Sale Deeds and Alleged Injunction Violations

Court’s Decision: The Bombay High Court dismissed the civil revision application (CRA) challenging the trial court's decision to reject an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of…
Posted by Rawlaw January 4, 2025

Posts pagination

Previous page 1 … 40 41 42 43 44 … 50 Next page

Recent News

  • CESTAT: “Suspicion Cannot Replace Proof” — Tribunal Sets Aside Confiscation and Penalties After Finding No Evidence of Overvaluation in Export Incentive Case
  • Supreme Court of India holds that “we find no good reason to interfere with the impugned order” — Apex Court upholds CESTAT’s ruling in indirect tax dispute and dismisses appeal filed by revenue authorities
  • Supreme Court of India observes that “registration under Section 12AA is not by itself sufficient to claim exemption under Section 80G” — Court issues notice in dispute concerning the charitable versus religious character of trust activities
  • Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh high court holds that “compassionate appointment is not a vested right and must strictly conform to the governing rules” — Court upholds rejection of request for government employment due to absence of legal entitlement
  • Madras high court holds that “levy of purchase tax is impermissible when the sale itself is liable to tax” — Court quashes Tribunal order and confirms that Section 7A cannot be invoked solely because the seller failed to remit tax
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top