Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news Raw Law

Unfiltered Legal Insights

  • News
  • Services for Advocates
  • Bookmarks
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

CESTAT

Home - CESTAT

section 64
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court dismisses Revenue appeal in service tax exemption case — “CESTAT rightly remanded for verification; no substantial question of law arises”

Court’s decision The Delhi High Court dismissed an appeal filed by the Principal Commissioner of CGST challenging a remand order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. The…
Posted by Rawlaw March 4, 2026
CESTAT says “a litigant should not suffer for administrative delay beyond his control” — two-year departmental inaction cannot defeat the right to appeal and reassessment claims must be examined on merits
Posted inNews

CESTAT says “a litigant should not suffer for administrative delay beyond his control” — two-year departmental inaction cannot defeat the right to appeal and reassessment claims must be examined on merits

Court's decision The CESTAT Customs excise and service tax appellate tribunal Chennai allowed the appeals by way of remand, setting aside the appellate order which had rejected the appeals solely…
Posted by Rawlaw December 14, 2025
CESTAT Mumbai holds that “services rendered to a foreign group entity accrue benefit outside India” — service tax demands on hospitality support services set aside as export of service
Posted inNews

CESTAT Mumbai holds that “services rendered to a foreign group entity accrue benefit outside India” — service tax demands on hospitality support services set aside as export of service

Court's decision The CESTAT (Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai), allowed a batch of appeals filed by a hospitality company and its senior executives and set aside the…
Posted by Rawlaw December 12, 2025
CESTAT Bangalore holds that “setting up of a factory is inseparable from manufacture” — denial of CENVAT credit on lease premium and pre-production services set aside
Posted inNews

CESTAT Bangalore holds that “setting up of a factory is inseparable from manufacture” — denial of CENVAT credit on lease premium and pre-production services set aside

Court's decision The CESTAT (Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore), allowed the appeal and set aside the order passed by the Commissioner of Central Tax and Central Excise,…
Posted by Rawlaw December 12, 2025
CESTAT New Delhi holds that “no question arises for granting interest from date of deposit” — Tribunal clarifies that interest on refund of differential customs duty applies only under Section 27A and not Section 35FF
Posted inNews

CESTAT New Delhi holds that “no question arises for granting interest from date of deposit” — Tribunal clarifies that interest on refund of differential customs duty applies only under Section 27A and not Section 35FF

Court's decision CESTAT dismissed both appeals and upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)’ order rejecting the demand for interest from the date of deposit. The Tribunal held in clear terms that the…
Posted by Rawlaw December 1, 2025
CESTAT holds that “a person cannot be placed in a more grievous situation for exercising appellate remedy” — Tribunal sets aside confiscation, redemption fine, and duty demand while restoring exemption under ASEAN-India FTA
Posted inNews

CESTAT holds that “a person cannot be placed in a more grievous situation for exercising appellate remedy” — Tribunal sets aside confiscation, redemption fine, and duty demand while restoring exemption under ASEAN-India FTA

Court’s decision CESTAT , in a detailed and emphatic ruling, set aside the impugned order confirming differential duty, interest, confiscation, and penalties in relation to multiple consignments imported under the…
Posted by Rawlaw December 1, 2025
Supreme Court of India holds that “we find no good reason to interfere with the impugned order” — Apex Court upholds CESTAT’s ruling in indirect tax dispute and dismisses appeal filed by revenue authorities
Posted inNews

Supreme Court of India holds that “we find no good reason to interfere with the impugned order” — Apex Court upholds CESTAT’s ruling in indirect tax dispute and dismisses appeal filed by revenue authorities

Court's decision The Supreme Court of India dismissed the appeal preferred by the Appellant authority and refused to interfere with the final order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service…
Posted by Rawlaw November 30, 2025
Supreme Court: holds that “we do not find any infirmity in the classification adopted by the Tribunal” — Apex Court dismisses revenue appeal and upholds CESTAT’s tax classification of trampoline and related amusement items
Posted inNews

Supreme Court: holds that “we do not find any infirmity in the classification adopted by the Tribunal” — Apex Court dismisses revenue appeal and upholds CESTAT’s tax classification of trampoline and related amusement items

Court’s decision The Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeal filed by the Appellant authority challenging the classification order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT). After…
Posted by Rawlaw November 29, 2025
CESTAT: “When the Law Itself Does Not Permit Penalty, No Authority Can Create It” — Tribunal Strikes Down Interest, Penalty, Confiscation and Redemption Fine on IGST Demand under Advance Authorization Scheme
Posted inNews

CESTAT: “When the Law Itself Does Not Permit Penalty, No Authority Can Create It” — Tribunal Strikes Down Interest, Penalty, Confiscation and Redemption Fine on IGST Demand under Advance Authorization Scheme

Court’s decision The CESTAT (Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai), allowed the appeal filed by the importer by setting aside the confiscation, redemption fine, penalty under Section 114A,…
Posted by Rawlaw November 16, 2025

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court Dismisses Father’s Habeas Corpus Plea For Return Of Child To UK; Holds “Custody Of The Minor Child With The Mother Is Not Illegal”, Welfare Of Child Remains Paramount
  • Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Release Of Attached Property In NSEL-MPID Case; Holds “MPID Act Has No Provision Regarding Release Of Property In Favour Of The Owner, After An Order Is Passed Permitting Auction”
  • Bombay High Court Refuses Licence For Slot Machines In Five-Star Hotel, Holds “1992 Goa Amendment Act Was Never Brought Into Force” In Daman And Diu; Says “Use Of Electronic Amusement/Slot Machines Remained Prohibited”
  • Bombay High Court Restores Written Statements In Commercial Suit Filed Within Statutory Outer Limit, Holds “Service Of Summons Without Copy Of Plaint And Accompaniments Would Not Constitute Valid Service In Law”
  • Bombay High Court Refuses To Decide ULC Possession Dispute In Writ Jurisdiction, Holds “Serious Disputed Questions Of Facts Arise”; Landowners Given Liberty To File Civil Suit
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top