Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

claim for maintenance

Home - claim for maintenance

disbursment
Posted inNews

Calcutta High Court Directs Disbursement of Compensation under Old Award to Subsequent Purchasers; Holds Section 24 of 2013 Act Inapplicable Since Acquisition was under 1948 Act and Land Already Vested with State “Subsequent purchasers are entitled only to receive compensation based on vendor’s title and cannot claim benefits under the 2013 Act”

Court’s Decision The Calcutta High Court directed the competent State Authority to disburse an amount of ₹6,53,715 along with interest at 8% per annum from 7 January 2014 until the…
Posted by Rawlaw July 16, 2025
Delhi High Court Dismisses Petition Against Interim Maintenance Award, Reaffirms ₹25,000 per Month for Wife and Minor Daughter, Emphasizing Petitioner’s Obligation to Support Family During Interim Period Pending Revision
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Dismisses Petition Against Interim Maintenance Award, Reaffirms ₹25,000 per Month for Wife and Minor Daughter, Emphasizing Petitioner’s Obligation to Support Family During Interim Period Pending Revision

Court's Decision: The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the interim maintenance order of ₹25,000 per month each to the wife and minor daughter, which was passed by the…
Posted by Rawlaw September 25, 2024

Recent News

  • Delhi High Court restores probate and upholds mother’s final wishes — “Suspicious circumstances must be proved, not presumed; unproved allegations cannot defeat a validly executed Will”
  • Supreme Court upholds conviction for aggravated sexual assault on a 4-year-old child, holding that “Medical evidence cannot override consistent ocular testimony,” but reduces sentence from seven to six years
  • Bombay High Court clarifies that “Auction timelines are part of legal proceedings” and holds that the pandemic-period delay in depositing auction amounts stands protected under the Supreme Court’s exclusion order
  • Bombay high court affirms labour-friendly approach, holding that “When an employer does not dispute employment, the workman deserves full protection of industrial justice” in reinstatement appeal
  • Bombay high court upholds preventive detention, holding that “Verification by senior police officers offers sufficient assurance of genuineness” and personal verification by detaining authority is not required
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top