Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Clarifying the Effect

Home » Clarifying the Effect
Kerala High Court Orders Removal of Attachment on Property After Dismissal of Suit for Default, Clarifying the Effect of Order 38 Rule 9 of CPC on Attachments Before Judgment
Posted inNews

Kerala High Court Orders Removal of Attachment on Property After Dismissal of Suit for Default, Clarifying the Effect of Order 38 Rule 9 of CPC on Attachments Before Judgment

Court’s Decision: The Kerala High Court ruled that the attachment order placed over the petitioner’s property, in the course of enforcing a money decree, must be vacated. The order for…
Posted by Rawlaw November 23, 2024

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court curtails Charity Commissioner’s overreach under public trust law — “Section 41A is about property and income, not moral correction,” apology direction quashed
  • Bombay High Court upholds quashing of stop-work notice under municipal law — “Authority must pass a reasoned order after reply; vague notices cannot stand,” appeal dismissed
  • Bombay High Court rejects MSME restructuring plea for ₹30 crore loan — “Eligibility under RBI revival framework hinges on loan limit, not outstanding exposure,” writ petition dismissed
  • Bombay High Court upholds arbitral award granting escalation despite restrictive clauses — “A defaulting employer cannot hide behind no-compensation terms,” commercial arbitration appeal dismissed
  • Bombay High Court refuses to appoint arbitrator for railway contract disputes exceeding 20% cap — “Party autonomy permits selective arbitrability; court cannot compel arbitration beyond agreed threshold,” Section 11 application dismissed
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top