Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

community

Home - community

anti-social activities
Posted inNews

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Passed Under Anti-Social Activities Act: “Offences Must Affect Community at Large to Qualify as Public Disorder”

Court’s Decision The Gujarat High Court quashed a preventive detention order passed under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 (PASA), holding that the material placed on record failed…
Posted by Rawlaw June 24, 2025
community not affected
Posted inNews

Gujarat High Court Quashes Detention of Alleged Bootlegger Under Anti-Social Activities Law: “Mere Breach of Law and Order Not Enough Unless Community is Affected”

Court’s Decision The Gujarat High Court quashed a preventive detention order passed under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985 (PASA), against a person alleged to be a “bootlegger.”…
Posted by Rawlaw June 24, 2025
quashing of preventive detention
Posted inNews

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Passed Under PASA—“Criminal Acts Cannot Be Equated With Public Disorder Unless Community at Large Is Affected”

Court’s Decision: The Gujarat High Court quashed a preventive detention order dated 01.05.2025 issued under Section 3 of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985 (PASA), declaring the detenue…
Posted by Rawlaw June 16, 2025

Recent News

  • “Comparable Sale Instances Must Prevail” – Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation After Finding Reference Court Erred in Ignoring Higher Valuation Evidence
  • “Arbitration Award Set Aside: Bombay High Court Slams ‘Denial of Natural Justice’ and Declares ‘An Arbitrator Must Give Reasons’ in a Powerful Ruling on Fundamental Policy Breach”
  • “Recovery Certificate Invalidated: Bombay High Court Issues a Powerful Warning That ‘Reasons Are the Soul of Justice’ While Reiterating That ‘A Registrar Must Apply His Mind Before Enforcing Recovery’”
  • Bombay High Court Declares That “A Clean Document Cannot Coexist With a Tainted Transaction,” Sets Aside Conviction After Finding Critical Contradictions in Evidence
  • Recovery Certificate under Section 101 Set Aside: Bombay High Court Holds That “Recording of Reasons Is a Fundamental Requirement” and Directs Denovo Inquiry for Non-Compliance with Rule 86A–86F
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top