Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

company

Home - company

electricity
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Directs Electricity Distribution Company to Provide Connection Without Ownership Dispute: “Right to Electricity Is a Basic Civic Necessity—Not a Proof of Property Ownership”

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court directed the electricity distribution company to install a new permanent electricity meter at a medical store located in the Wazirpur Industrial Area, New Delhi,…
Posted by Rawlaw October 9, 2025
quashing of FIR
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Denies Quashing of FIR in Alleged Bribery Case Involving Director of Customs Refund Company, Citing Serious Offences Against Public Administration and Commercial Integrity

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quashing of an FIR registered under various sections of the…
Posted by Rawlaw July 16, 2025
Section 138 NI Act
Posted inNews

Calcutta High Court Quashes Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act for Lack of Authorisation—”Complainant Cannot Proceed in Personal Capacity on Behalf of Company”

Court’s Decision: The Calcutta High Court set aside the conviction of the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, holding that the complaint filed by a company…
Posted by Rawlaw June 16, 2025

Recent News

  • “Comparable Sale Instances Must Prevail” – Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation After Finding Reference Court Erred in Ignoring Higher Valuation Evidence
  • “Arbitration Award Set Aside: Bombay High Court Slams ‘Denial of Natural Justice’ and Declares ‘An Arbitrator Must Give Reasons’ in a Powerful Ruling on Fundamental Policy Breach”
  • “Recovery Certificate Invalidated: Bombay High Court Issues a Powerful Warning That ‘Reasons Are the Soul of Justice’ While Reiterating That ‘A Registrar Must Apply His Mind Before Enforcing Recovery’”
  • Bombay High Court Declares That “A Clean Document Cannot Coexist With a Tainted Transaction,” Sets Aside Conviction After Finding Critical Contradictions in Evidence
  • Recovery Certificate under Section 101 Set Aside: Bombay High Court Holds That “Recording of Reasons Is a Fundamental Requirement” and Directs Denovo Inquiry for Non-Compliance with Rule 86A–86F
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top