Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • News
  • Services for Advocates
  • Bookmarks
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Contractual Dispute

Home » Contractual Dispute
bank mortgage
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court holds civil court can examine sale agreement rescission despite bank mortgage—“Tribunal jurisdiction does not extend to pre-mortgage contractual disputes”; revision dismissed

Court’s decision The Bombay High Court refused to interfere with an order declining rejection of a civil suit at the threshold, holding that a suit seeking rescission of a sale…
Posted by Rawlaw February 8, 2026
Chhattisgarh-High-Court-Dismisses-Contractors-Writ-for-Compensation-in-Construction-Dispute-Disputed-Questions-of-Fact-Cannot-Be-Examined-Under-Article-226—Proper-Remedy-Lies-Before-Civil-Court
Posted inNews

Chhattisgarh High Court Dismisses Contractor’s Writ for Compensation in Construction Dispute: “Disputed Questions of Fact Cannot Be Examined Under Article 226—Proper Remedy Lies Before Civil Court”

Court’s Decision The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking compensation for construction work allegedly executed and raw material lost due to…
Posted by Rawlaw June 26, 2025
Chhattisgarh-High-Court-Refuses-Payment-Relief-to-Contractor-for-Pending-Bills-in-Government-Bridge-Project-Relief-Cannot-Be-Granted-Under-Article-226-Where-Factual-Controversies-Exist
Posted inNews

Chhattisgarh High Court Refuses Payment Relief to Contractor for Pending Bills in Government Bridge Project: “Relief Cannot Be Granted Under Article 226 Where Factual Controversies Exist”

Court’s Decision In a judgment dated 9 June 2025, the Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking directions for payment of ₹76 lakhs in pending bills for a government…
Posted by Rawlaw June 19, 2025

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court holds admitted documents dispense with proof — “Port Trust liable to refund illegal auction proceeds, ownership established by admissions”
  • Bombay High Court refuses to quash deemed conveyance despite fraud and title objections — “MOFA authority’s role is summary, civil court alone can decide ownership”
  • Bombay High Court upholds SIDBI pension cut-off date — “Denial of retrospective pension not arbitrary, policy choice backed by Supreme Court precedent”
  • Bombay High Court orders grant of deemed conveyance under MOFA — “Promoter’s delay defeated, statutory agreements prevail over disputed consents”
  • Delhi High Court denies residence order under Domestic Violence Act — “Voluntary relocation defeats claim to re-enter past shared household”
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top