Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • News
  • Services for Advocates
  • Bookmarks
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Court Rejects Additional Evidence in Appeal Under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC

Home - Court Rejects Additional Evidence in Appeal Under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC

Bombay High Court Rejects Additional Evidence in Appeal Under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC: "Failure to Establish Due Diligence and Relevance; ₹5 Lakh Costs Imposed for Delaying Justice"
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Rejects Additional Evidence in Appeal Under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC: “Failure to Establish Due Diligence and Relevance; ₹5 Lakh Costs Imposed for Delaying Justice”

Court’s Decision: The Bombay High Court dismissed the appellants' Chamber Summons seeking to introduce additional evidence under Order 41 Rule 27(1)(aa) of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC). It ruled…
Posted by Rawlaw December 28, 2024

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court: Keeping employees temporary for years despite perennial work is unfair labour practice — “Nashik District Central Co-operative Bank directed to consider regularisation”
  • Bombay High Court: Axe blow on wife’s neck after drunken quarrel proves murder— “Delay in FIR and inquest before registration not fatal; life sentence upheld”
  • Madras High Court: Motor accident compensation enhanced to ₹15.28 lakh — “Functional disability, not medical disability, determines loss of earning capacity”
  • Madras High Court: Sudden braking by car driver caused fatal bridge accident — “Compensation enhanced to ₹22 lakh despite 30% contributory negligence”
  • Madras High Court: Woman convicted of housebreaking granted bail pending appeal — “Two concurrent sentences do not bar suspension of sentence”
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top