Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Declares 20% BSP Deduction Excessive—”Unfair and One-Sided Agreements Cannot Disadvantage Homebuyers”

Home - Declares 20% BSP Deduction Excessive—"Unfair and One-Sided Agreements Cannot Disadvantage Homebuyers"

Supreme Court Limits Forfeiture in Real Estate Contracts, Declares 20% BSP Deduction Excessive—"Unfair and One-Sided Agreements Cannot Disadvantage Homebuyers"
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Limits Forfeiture in Real Estate Contracts, Declares 20% BSP Deduction Excessive—”Unfair and One-Sided Agreements Cannot Disadvantage Homebuyers”

Court’s Decision The Supreme Court of India partially upheld the decision of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC), ruling that forfeiture of 20% of the Basic Sale Price (BSP)…
Posted by Rawlaw February 17, 2025

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court Upholds Tilaknagar Industries’ Exclusive Rights Over “Mansion House” and “Savoy Club” Trademarks, Restrains Allied Blenders and Distillers from Use, Reaffirming 2011 Judgment
  • Delhi High Court Upholds Maintainability of Suit for Declaration and Cancellation of Sale Deed Without Possession: Affirms Jurisdictional Bar Under Section 50 of the Delhi Rent Control Act and Dismisses Second Appeal for Lack of Substantial Question of Law Under Section 100 CPC
  • Karnataka High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC: Directs Trial Court to Determine Whether Plaintiffs’ Declaration Claim is Barred by Limitation Under Article 59 of the Limitation Act, Ensuring Fair Adjudication of Dispute
  • Kerala High Court Dismisses Challenge to High Powered Committee’s Jurisdiction: Affirms Supreme Court’s Pan India Authority Over Elephant Welfare, Transfer, and Rehabilitation, Rejects Per Incuriam Claim Against National Oversight
  • Delhi High Court Dismisses State’s Appeal Against Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case: Upholds Double Presumption of Innocence and Rules That Variance in Public Analyst and CFL Reports Weakens Prosecution’s Case Under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top