Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Declares Assessment Order Invalid for Exceeding Statutory Time Limit—”Even a Day’s Delay Renders the Assessment Barred by Limitation”

Home - Declares Assessment Order Invalid for Exceeding Statutory Time Limit—"Even a Day's Delay Renders the Assessment Barred by Limitation"

Calcutta High Court Refuses to Condone Delay in Filing Written Statement in Commercial Suit: “Time Limit under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Is Mandatory in Commercial Disputes”
Posted inNews

Calcutta High Court Refuses to Condone Delay in Filing Written Statement in Commercial Suit: “Time Limit under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Is Mandatory in Commercial Disputes”

Court’s Decision The Calcutta High Court, Commercial Division, dismissed the defendant’s application seeking condonation of delay in filing the written statement beyond the 120-day period mandated under Order VIII Rule…
Posted by Rawlaw June 18, 2025
Delhi High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal, Declares Assessment Order Invalid for Exceeding Statutory Time Limit—"Even a Day's Delay Renders the Assessment Barred by Limitation"
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Dismisses Revenue’s Appeal, Declares Assessment Order Invalid for Exceeding Statutory Time Limit—”Even a Day’s Delay Renders the Assessment Barred by Limitation”

Court’s Decision The court dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue and affirmed the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), which had held that the assessment order passed…
Posted by Rawlaw February 17, 2025

Recent News

  • Chhattisgarh High Court: “Divorced Government Servant Cannot Be Considered Unmarried for Compassionate Appointment” — Brother of Deceased Teacher Held Ineligible Under Policy
  • Chhattisgarh High Court Upholds Driver Recruitment Between Two Equally Scoring Candidates: “Written test scores were identical, and the differentiator was the skill test, where the selected candidate secured a better grade”.
  • Delhi High Court Dismisses Challenge to SEBI Surveillance Notices: “No Material Part of the Cause of Action Arose in Delhi, lacked territorial jurisdiction to entertain the petition”
  • Delhi High Court: “Absence of zebra crossing is not proof of contributory negligence” — Court reduces deduction to 10% – Functional disability is distinct from permanent disability; impact on earning capacity must be specifically proved.
  • Karnataka High Court Restores Convictions in Cheque Dishonour Cases: “Mere marking of receipt in both cases not a ground to doubt financial capacity without rebuttal evidence”
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top