Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Declares Mining Leases Void for Non-Compliance with MMDR Act — “No Vested Right Without Prior Mining Plan Approval”: IBM Justified in Revoking Plans

Home - Declares Mining Leases Void for Non-Compliance with MMDR Act — “No Vested Right Without Prior Mining Plan Approval”: IBM Justified in Revoking Plans

Gauhati High Court Declares Mining Leases Void for Non-Compliance with MMDR Act — “No Vested Right Without Prior Mining Plan Approval”: IBM Justified in Revoking Plans, Applications Deemed Lapsed After 2021 Amendment
Posted inNews

Gauhati High Court Declares Mining Leases Void for Non-Compliance with MMDR Act — “No Vested Right Without Prior Mining Plan Approval”: IBM Justified in Revoking Plans, Applications Deemed Lapsed After 2021 Amendment

1. Court’s Decision The court ruled that the mining leases granted on 29.01.2021 were void and without effect, as they failed to comply with statutory requirements. It further held that…
Posted by Rawlaw May 29, 2025

Recent News

  • CESTAT New Delhi holds that “no question arises for granting interest from date of deposit” — Tribunal clarifies that interest on refund of differential customs duty applies only under Section 27A and not Section 35FF
  • Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal: “Export Is Complete the Moment Goods Cross India’s Borders” — Tribunal Quashes Confiscation and Restores Drawback for Shipments Diverted to Dubai, Rejects Revenue’s Reliance on RBI Circular
  • CESTAT: “Suspicion Cannot Replace Proof” — Tribunal Sets Aside Confiscation and Penalties After Finding No Evidence of Overvaluation in Export Incentive Case
  • CESTAT holds that “a person cannot be placed in a more grievous situation for exercising appellate remedy” — Tribunal sets aside confiscation, redemption fine, and duty demand while restoring exemption under ASEAN-India FTA
  • Supreme Court of India holds that “we find no good reason to interfere with the impugned order” — Apex Court upholds CESTAT’s ruling in indirect tax dispute and dismisses appeal filed by revenue authorities
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top