Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Delhi High Court Affirms Maintainability of Subsequent Purchasers’ Appeals Under SARFAESI Act

Home » Delhi High Court Affirms Maintainability of Subsequent Purchasers' Appeals Under SARFAESI Act
Delhi High Court Affirms Maintainability of Subsequent Purchasers' Appeals Under SARFAESI Act, Sets Aside DRAT Order and Remands Case for Reconsideration on Merits with Pre-Deposit Directive
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Affirms Maintainability of Subsequent Purchasers’ Appeals Under SARFAESI Act, Sets Aside DRAT Order and Remands Case for Reconsideration on Merits with Pre-Deposit Directive

Court’s Decision: The Delhi High Court ruled that the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) erred in dismissing the appeal of subsequent purchasers on the grounds of maintainability. The Court held…
Posted by Rawlaw December 27, 2024

Recent News

  • Delhi High Court upholds revocation of letter of administration — “Obtained after 22 years by suppressing widow and daughter; probate court cannot reward concealment” while dismissing heirs’ appeal
  • Delhi High Court grants default bail in NDPS case — “Extension of investigation without producing accused is a gross illegality; right to statutory bail flows from Article 21” while setting aside trial court orders
  • Delhi High Court holds insurer liable for tractor–trolley death and recalculates compensation — “Trailer accident flows from insured tractor; welfare object of Motor Vehicles Act cannot be defeated by technicalities” while marginally enhancing award
  • Delhi High Court declines to quash reassessment at threshold — “Limitation under Section 149 post-Ashish Agarwal requires factual computation by Assessing Officer” while remanding matter
  • Delhi High Court upholds finding on genuineness of Will despite dismissal of probate — “Proof of execution can stand independent of probate relief; secondary evidence admissible on proof of loss” while rejecting son’s challenge
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top