Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Delhi High Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator Under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act: “Judicial Role is Limited to Validating the Existence of Arbitration Agreements”

Home - Delhi High Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator Under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act: "Judicial Role is Limited to Validating the Existence of Arbitration Agreements"

Delhi High Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator Under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act: "Judicial Role is Limited to Validating the Existence of Arbitration Agreements"
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator Under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act: “Judicial Role is Limited to Validating the Existence of Arbitration Agreements”

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court resolved the petition filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by appointing a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between…
Posted by Rawlaw January 1, 2025

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court Holds That Land Reservation Under MRTP Act Lapses If No Acquisition Steps Are Taken: “Mere Payment for Measurement Charges Is Not a Step Towards Acquisition; Authorities Cannot Deprive Landowners of Their Rights Indefinitely”
  • Supreme Court Holds Termination of Daily-Wage Workmen Illegal: “Employer Cannot Use Recruitment Ban to Deny Regularization; Sections 6E & 6N of U.P. Industrial Disputes Act Violated”—Orders Reinstatement with Back Wages and Regularization Process
  • Delhi High Court Upholds Arbitral Award: Rejects Challenge Against Liquidated Damages, Unlawful Encashment of Performance Bank Guarantee, and Misinterpretation of Price Variation Clause in Metro Rail Supply Contract Dispute
  • Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award Rejecting Contractor’s Claims: Holds Clause 49.5 of GCC Validly Bars Damages for Employer-Caused Delays, Estoppel Prevents Appellant From Reneging on Written Undertakings, and Judicial Intervention Under Section 37 Arbitration Act is Limited
  • Bombay High Court Quashes IFS Officer’s Transfer Due to Procedural Irregularities: Holds Handwritten Alterations in Civil Services Board Minutes Render Decision Invalid, Leaves Open Question of State vs. Central Rules for Future Determination
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top