Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Delhi High Court: Bank Cannot Unilaterally Alter Interest Rates in Violation of Sanction Letter and RBI Guidelines; Orders Refund of ₹2.04 Crores with 9% Interest

Home - Delhi High Court: Bank Cannot Unilaterally Alter Interest Rates in Violation of Sanction Letter and RBI Guidelines; Orders Refund of ₹2.04 Crores with 9% Interest

Delhi High Court: Bank Cannot Unilaterally Alter Interest Rates in Violation of Sanction Letter and RBI Guidelines; Orders Refund of ₹2.04 Crores with 9% Interest, Upholding Borrower's Rights in Consortium Agreements
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court: Bank Cannot Unilaterally Alter Interest Rates in Violation of Sanction Letter and RBI Guidelines; Orders Refund of ₹2.04 Crores with 9% Interest, Upholding Borrower’s Rights in Consortium Agreements

Court’s Decision: The Delhi High Court decreed that the plaintiff is entitled to recover ₹2,04,30,669/- along with interest at 9% per annum from the date of filing the suit until…
Posted by Rawlaw December 27, 2024

Recent News

  • Supreme Court on AIFF Elections: “The process must be transparent and democratic” – Court restructures electoral framework, ensures compliance with FIFA requirements, and balances players’ representation with good governance
  • Bombay High Court: “When murder occurs inside the matrimonial home, the burden to explain lies on the husband” – Conviction for axe-killing of pregnant wife upheld, sentence modified
  • Bombay High Court on Civic Planning in Badlapur: “A town with lakhs of citizens cannot survive without sewer lines” – Court directs strict scrutiny of Occupation Certificate, environmental clearances, and remedial action
  • Patna High Court on Public Distribution Shop Selection: “When statutory remedies exist, writ jurisdiction should not be invoked” – Court directs petitioner to file application before Divisional Commissioner, condonation of delay permitted
  • Bombay High Court on Bail in Rape Case: “Seriousness of charges, antecedents, and conduct make applicant unfit for bail” – Court rejects plea citing violent assault, prior POCSO offence, and misuse of procedural rights
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top